After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
Their sycophancy has opened the eyes of the Taiwanese people to the ugliness of Lien and Soong's characters, but also to the feudal style of China's government in acquiring vassals. None of this is compatible with modern democracy.
Now that Lien and Soong have returned, it is time to assess the results of their betrayal of Taiwan's interests. First and foremost, as chairmen of opposition parties, their ability to sell out Taiwan's sovereignty is limited.
China might seem to have won some slight advantage at the level of political rhetoric, using Lien and Soong as part of their "united front" strategy to give credibility to the "one China" fantasy. But even if Lien and Soong proclaim China's greatness like loyal retainers, they cannot frighten Taiwan.
The cross-strait question has two aspects.
The first is the political aspect, which at its heart is about sovereignty.
The second is the actual situation and what can be done about it.
On the political front, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Lien knew what he was in for, and tossed the whole idea of the Republic of China into the Taiwan Strait before he even arrived. Soong wanted to be tough, but in the end -- under pressure from various fronts -- he also swallowed his words.
Hu was tough, and Lien and Soong came out looking weak. But then, those who capitulate cannot dictate terms, and must simply wait on those to whom they have capitulated.
When Hu insisted that the basis of the cross-strait issue would be based on the "1992 consensus," neither Lien nor Soong dared to say anything. Lien's "news release" spoke of the "1992 consensus" and Soong's statement mentioned the "two sides of the strait, one China" idea, but these are just footnotes to Hu's statement.
As the issue of sovereignty has already been decided by Hu, any point in Lien's five-point communique or Soong's six-point agreement, which disagrees with Hu's statement, will necessarily be overruled.
As for the practical aspects of the situation, only the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration, which is invested with public power, can achieve anything.
Hu is clearly delighted that Lien and Soong have tried to sell out Taiwan. But apart from selling themselves, what else can Lien and Soong do?
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS