On Friday, Beijing's National Tourism Administration announced a plan to lift restrictions on tourist travel to Taiwan and said it hoped to engage in negotiations through the model used for the Lunar New Year charter flights.
At first glance, this may appear to be a "generous gift" from China -- at least that is the way that Beijing and some groups within Taiwan would like to portray the move. However, a closer look reveals that this will most likely not bring the kind of benefits that the people of Taiwan -- especially the tourism industry -- are hoping for.
A skill that Beijing apparently is sharpening in dealing with Taiwan is to exaggerate the benefits of its supposed goodwill gestures to create an illusion of magnanimity. So long as it successfully creates the desired impression, very few people bother to check later whether any substantive benefits actually result.
Two cases in point are the recent trips to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Another case in point is the so-called "opening up" promised by Beijing in September on travel by Xiamen residents to Kinmen through the existing "small three links." In the six months since that policy's implementation, only 300 people have been approved for such trips by the Chinese government. This figure is significantly lower than what had been anticipated. Reportedly, this is because it takes up to a month for the Chinese tourists to get government approval.
It is noteworthy that the statement issued by the National Tourism Administration on Friday failed to touch on how much "opening up" Beijing has in mind, in terms of the number of visits it will allow, as well as simplifying and shortening the approval process on the Chinese side. Under the circumstances, those critics in Taiwan who were quick to complain about the number tentatively offered by Taiwan's government -- to allow up to 1,000 Chinese tourists into Taiwan each day -- in all likelihood spoke too quickly. It won't be a big surprise if far fewer Chinese tourists end up coming to Taiwan each day due to the Chinese government's bureaucracy.
And that's not to mention the fact that Taiwan's government still hasn't figured out a way to deal with the problem of Chinese tourists remaining here illegally. The recent visits by Chinese tourists traveling to Taiwan from third countries is a telling example. Taiwan opened up to this kind of tourism in 2002, and already visitors are staying here illegally. That problem will only be amplified under the more comprehensive opening up now being contemplated.
Then there is the issue of the model for negotiations. Unlike the one-off Lunar New Year charter flights, opening up to Chinese tourists requires a comprehensive and permanent policy. More formal government-to-government negotiations are in order. Otherwise, Taiwan may pay a steep price on the sovereignty issue in exchange for meager economic benefits.
In Taiwan's exchanges and dealings with Beijing thus far, China has never lost a single round or made any substantive concession. Under the circumstances, with respect to those people who sincerely feel excited about this so-called "opening up" of tourism to Taiwan, one can only admire their innocence.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS