President Chen Shui-bian's (
Since 1949, a series of dramatic transformations in world politics have generated both opportunities and challenges for Taipei. During the early months of 1950, it appeared that Taiwan would be overrun by the People's Republic of China (PRC). The US refused to assist the island in its efforts to repel Communist aggression. After the outbreak of the Korean conflict on June 25, 1950, however, the Truman administration reversed its position. Washington and Taipei signed a defense treaty in 1954 and massive amounts of US economic and military aid poured into Taiwan.
During the late 1960s, strategic considerations led US president Richard Nixon to seek a rapprochement with China and in 1971 the US quietly acquiesced to Taiwan's expulsion from the UN. In 1979, Washington cut its ties with Taipei to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing. These moves came as a devastating blow to Taiwan, but there was nothing that the Taiwanese government could do about it.
The end of the Cold War helped Taiwan strengthen its ties with the US. American arms sales escalated and Washington upgraded its "unofficial" relations with Taipei. At the same time, relations with Beijing deteriorated. China ultimately came to be viewed as a "strategic competitor" of the US.
The 9/11 attacks led to a dramatic shift in the US foreign policy paradigm. US military strategy shifted from the deterrence that characterized the Cold War and toward pre-emptive action against terrorists. The new paradigm has moved China off Washington's "enemies list." Gone are the descriptions of China as a "strategic competitor." US President George W. Bush now praises the PRC as "the most important country" in the region.
The war against terrorism (and the North Korean nuclear crisis) has helped push Washington closer to Beijing. This helps explain why some Bush administration officials have criticized Taiwan. In fact, the link between the war on terrorism and strains in US-Taiwan relations was made clear when former US Secretary of State Colin Powell praised the "the positive role" that China has played in the war on terror while expressing his opposition to Taiwan's independence during a press conference last October.
To be sure, US-Taiwan relations have experienced some bumps in recent years. But many of these problems must be traced to structural shifts in global politics that are beyond Taipei's control. And in fact, US economic, military and political ties with Taiwan remain robust.
The US is no longer Taiwan's largest export outlet, but America remains Taiwan's second largest market, and bilateral economic ties have grown closer as a result of joint-venture partnerships and technology transfers. Moreover, despite PRC pressures, the US has no plans to reduce its arms sales or security commitments to Taiwan and it steadfastly opposes schemes hatched by some greedy European governments to sell arms to China. Furthermore, US support for Taiwan's participation in global institutions -- especially the World Health Organization -- continues to increase.
Maintaining strong ties with Washington is only one of the many challenges that Taipei will confront during Chen's second administration. But these challenges should not be exaggerated. Nor should they be attributed solely to one politician or camp.
Working together, the Taiwanese people will overcome the challenges that lie ahead.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science at Missouri State University.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS