The members of the National Assembly have now been elected. Although the 23.36 percent voter turnout last Saturday was a historic low, the vote must be seen as a decisive victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), both of whom support constitutional reforms. Neither the direction nor the momentum of political reforms will be diminished. This indicates that while democracy in this country may still have its ups and downs, its foundations are solid.
The assembly has the task of ratifying the legislature's constitutional amendments. Because 83 percent of the vote was in favor of the DPP and the KMT, regardless of whether a simple, two-thirds or three-quarters majority is used as the standard for the assembly vote, the amendment bill will be ratified.
Long-term political goals, such as halving the number of legislative seats, adopting a "single-member district, two-vote" legislative electoral system, writing referendums into the Constitution, eliminating the National Assembly and others, will now be realized. As a result, this nation will have a better quality of legislator and elections will become better ordered affairs. Demagogues will gradually lose ground and the quality of the country's democracy will improve. With these elections, Taiwan's democracy has passed another milestone.
This election has also changed the political environment. With the introduction of a "single-member district, two-vote" system, the existence of small parties such as the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and the People First Party (PFP) are now under threat. So even though both signed agreements to support legislative reform last August, they now oppose it. This inconsistency is behind their poor performance in Saturday's elections.
Yesterday, the PFP legislative caucus slammed the door shut on cooperation with the government. This is no more than the party's death throes. The incessant changes in the PFP's political stance simply goes to show it turns whichever way the wind blows.
Now the legislature must pass a statute governing the assembly's exercise of power (
Nevertheless, the elections showed that regardless of which majority is used, the constitutional amendments will go ahead. In careful consideration of the legitimacy and appropriateness of future proposed constitutional amendments, a two-thirds majority is probably the more reasonable choice.
It is a matter of regret that the legitimacy of the amendments, regardless of what voting rules are adopted, will always be less than absolute because of the tiny turnout for the election. But this does not affect the legality of the elections, for not voting is also an expression of opinion and must be respected. The only reason that the PFP has called for a constitutional interpretation on this issue is because it performed so badly. Voters will have little sympathy for such thoughtless behavior.
This will be the final session of the National Assembly before it vanishes into history. Its agenda is very simple. It is required to ratify a bill to amend the Constitution, but cannot alter the substance of the amendments. How the members will vote has been largely decided by the parties and the voters. Therefore, this meeting of the assembly should be simple and efficient. The instigation of new political conflicts must be avoided. If things are kept simple, the whole assembly could be concluded within the week.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS