The members of the National Assembly have now been elected. Although the 23.36 percent voter turnout last Saturday was a historic low, the vote must be seen as a decisive victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), both of whom support constitutional reforms. Neither the direction nor the momentum of political reforms will be diminished. This indicates that while democracy in this country may still have its ups and downs, its foundations are solid.
The assembly has the task of ratifying the legislature's constitutional amendments. Because 83 percent of the vote was in favor of the DPP and the KMT, regardless of whether a simple, two-thirds or three-quarters majority is used as the standard for the assembly vote, the amendment bill will be ratified.
Long-term political goals, such as halving the number of legislative seats, adopting a "single-member district, two-vote" legislative electoral system, writing referendums into the Constitution, eliminating the National Assembly and others, will now be realized. As a result, this nation will have a better quality of legislator and elections will become better ordered affairs. Demagogues will gradually lose ground and the quality of the country's democracy will improve. With these elections, Taiwan's democracy has passed another milestone.
This election has also changed the political environment. With the introduction of a "single-member district, two-vote" system, the existence of small parties such as the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and the People First Party (PFP) are now under threat. So even though both signed agreements to support legislative reform last August, they now oppose it. This inconsistency is behind their poor performance in Saturday's elections.
Yesterday, the PFP legislative caucus slammed the door shut on cooperation with the government. This is no more than the party's death throes. The incessant changes in the PFP's political stance simply goes to show it turns whichever way the wind blows.
Now the legislature must pass a statute governing the assembly's exercise of power (
Nevertheless, the elections showed that regardless of which majority is used, the constitutional amendments will go ahead. In careful consideration of the legitimacy and appropriateness of future proposed constitutional amendments, a two-thirds majority is probably the more reasonable choice.
It is a matter of regret that the legitimacy of the amendments, regardless of what voting rules are adopted, will always be less than absolute because of the tiny turnout for the election. But this does not affect the legality of the elections, for not voting is also an expression of opinion and must be respected. The only reason that the PFP has called for a constitutional interpretation on this issue is because it performed so badly. Voters will have little sympathy for such thoughtless behavior.
This will be the final session of the National Assembly before it vanishes into history. Its agenda is very simple. It is required to ratify a bill to amend the Constitution, but cannot alter the substance of the amendments. How the members will vote has been largely decided by the parties and the voters. Therefore, this meeting of the assembly should be simple and efficient. The instigation of new political conflicts must be avoided. If things are kept simple, the whole assembly could be concluded within the week.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS