Yesterday's National Assembly elections will be remembered for a record-low turnout -- 23.35 percent. But 83 percent voted for political parties that support amendment of the Constitution. So it seems that, as predicted, the constitutional amendments will be approved by the National Assembly when it convenes.
Voter turnout rates have experienced a decline in elections subsequent to last year's presidential poll. Of course, a number of factors have contributed to this latest drop, including the weather and voter burnout.
But even more importantly, the public is increasingly tired of watching politicians bickering among themselves and shifting on their messages around election time.
Distraction of voters by the meaningless trips to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
But Lien and Soong's hopes that their trips to China would help their parties have been dashed. This is especially true in the case of the PFP, whose support is withering.
The KMT gained 38.92 percent of the vote, which was higher than its vote for the legislative elections. However, it gained 117 seats, three less than its goal of 120 seats.
More significantly, it was defeated in terms of number of seats by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which received 42.52 percent of the vote and 127 seats.
Under these circumstances, Lien -- whom many speculate was hoping for a decisive victory in this election to keep his chairman's post -- is most likely to have been very disappointed.
But the PFP is the biggest loser in this election, winning only 6.11 percent of the vote and 18 seats. The party now faces the most serious threat to its survival since it was founded.
Its support in this election was significantly down on even its reduced support for the legislative elections. This time, it was also upstaged by the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) which ranked third with 7.05 percent of the vote and 21 seats. The KMT's increase in support seems to have come at the expense of the PFP, and support for the pan-blue camp remains unchanged despite the two chairmen's visits to China.
For the TSU, defeating the PFP to become the third largest party in the National Assembly is a big accomplishment.
As for the DPP, it performed a lot better than expected, especially given the pessimism that resulted after a week of bickering with the TSU. The number of DPP seats, 127, is higher than its goal of 120 seats. Of greater interest, however, is the fact that the DPP vote was significantly higher than for the legislative elections.
The encouraging message that emerges from the poll is that, despite the dramatically low turnout, the nation is finally back on the road to reform. The Constitution must be amended, and these amendments bode well for the maturation of Taiwan's democracy.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS