Yesterday's National Assembly elections will be remembered for a record-low turnout -- 23.35 percent. But 83 percent voted for political parties that support amendment of the Constitution. So it seems that, as predicted, the constitutional amendments will be approved by the National Assembly when it convenes.
Voter turnout rates have experienced a decline in elections subsequent to last year's presidential poll. Of course, a number of factors have contributed to this latest drop, including the weather and voter burnout.
But even more importantly, the public is increasingly tired of watching politicians bickering among themselves and shifting on their messages around election time.
Distraction of voters by the meaningless trips to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
But Lien and Soong's hopes that their trips to China would help their parties have been dashed. This is especially true in the case of the PFP, whose support is withering.
The KMT gained 38.92 percent of the vote, which was higher than its vote for the legislative elections. However, it gained 117 seats, three less than its goal of 120 seats.
More significantly, it was defeated in terms of number of seats by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which received 42.52 percent of the vote and 127 seats.
Under these circumstances, Lien -- whom many speculate was hoping for a decisive victory in this election to keep his chairman's post -- is most likely to have been very disappointed.
But the PFP is the biggest loser in this election, winning only 6.11 percent of the vote and 18 seats. The party now faces the most serious threat to its survival since it was founded.
Its support in this election was significantly down on even its reduced support for the legislative elections. This time, it was also upstaged by the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) which ranked third with 7.05 percent of the vote and 21 seats. The KMT's increase in support seems to have come at the expense of the PFP, and support for the pan-blue camp remains unchanged despite the two chairmen's visits to China.
For the TSU, defeating the PFP to become the third largest party in the National Assembly is a big accomplishment.
As for the DPP, it performed a lot better than expected, especially given the pessimism that resulted after a week of bickering with the TSU. The number of DPP seats, 127, is higher than its goal of 120 seats. Of greater interest, however, is the fact that the DPP vote was significantly higher than for the legislative elections.
The encouraging message that emerges from the poll is that, despite the dramatically low turnout, the nation is finally back on the road to reform. The Constitution must be amended, and these amendments bode well for the maturation of Taiwan's democracy.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,