As Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) sat down, pundits were questioning who needs who more? Does the aging Lien, who has never won a real election, need Hu to salvage his image and even keep in the game? Does Hu need Lien for public relations and to put pressure on President Chen Shui-bian(陳水扁)?
The real question, however, is at a deeper level. Does Taiwan need China or does China need Taiwan? My view? China needs Taiwan, hands down.
Let's forget about the fact that the People's Republic of China (PRC) needs Taiwan so its submarines and navy can have immediate blue water access.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs Taiwan to dominate travel between the East and South China Seas and so isolate Japan and the Koreas from their other Asian neighbors.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs the cash cow Taiwan, with its millions of Taiwanese investment dollars and businesses to help fuel its growing economy.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs Taiwan because foreign companies don't trust China's rule of law and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, and so use Taiwan as a safe place for their R&D investments and access to China markets. Let's forget these many pragmatic reasons. The PRC needs Taiwan because of the "D" word.
Yes, the "D" word, democracy. Democracy is not antithetical to those of Chinese heritage. China needs Taiwan to show that democracy can and does work. It needs Taiwan to see that its people can be trusted with the right to vote.
Chinese can live by rule of law.
Chinese don't have to be treated like children, to be "protected" from themselves by a privileged hierarchical elite.
Chinese don't need their religion and beliefs controlled. The Falun Gong have never posed a threat to Taiwan's rule of law.
Chinese don't need their press muzzled. A free press and access to information and differing points of view have made Taiwan vibrant, not destructive.
Chinese don't need to be imprisoned if they question or challenge the government and its judgment. Taiwan's many vocal dissident minorities freely stroll the streets.
Contrary to PRC propaganda, chaos is not the result of the above freedoms.
Taiwan has shown that free people with free elections and a free press can live harmoniously under the rule of law even in little matters. When Taiwan imposed a motorcycle helmet law, many foreigners said, "It won't work, Chinese think the law is for other people." But it worked.
When Taipei imposed a strict separation of garbage and trash, foreigners said, "Chinese won't go into such detail for the environment." But they did.
Believe it or not, Taiwanese have and continue to show the way for those of Chinese heritage.
So maybe then, after more than a half a century since the People's Liberation Army "liberated" those in China, it's time to start trusting the people.
Does China need Taiwan? You bet.
China needs Taiwan to understand its own people and culture.
Jerome Keating has lived in Taiwan for 16 years and is co-author of Island in the Stream, A Quick Case Study of Taiwan's Complex History.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS