Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
News of Lien's visit has filled almost every TV news show and most newspapers. Public opinion polls associated with these reports show Lien enjoying a huge surge in his prestige. It would seem that Lien has been able, in one trip, to resolve the half-century long stand-off across the Taiwan Strait and that peace and unification with China are now just around the corner.
This is a big joke and is no more than an illusion perpetrated by the media. To interpret this situation, we must first understand Taiwan's media environment. Apart from a few public TV stations, almost all TV stations in Taiwan are controlled by forces close to the pan-blue camp. That the two major newspapers established by KMT Central Standing Committee members favor the pan-blue camp goes without saying. When has an opinion poll by a Taiwanese media outlet ever been accurate? Which poll has not had its results predetermined by political concerns? Are the polls concerning Lien's visit to China any more credible?
Of all the Chinese-language media, only the Liberty Times and the Taiwan Daily continue to put Taiwan first, and Lien is using every media outlet at his disposal to drown them out. How can the outside world perceive the truth of Taiwan's politics when the media keeps a muzzle on dissenting opinion? OK, so pan-green voters may not have their own media outlets, but there is still the vast realm of the Internet. The only way to get an understanding of the Taiwanese people's thoughts regarding Lien's visit to China is to log on to the Internet and see first-hand Taiwanese people's derision.
On Tuesday, China gave Lien a gift of three ways to buy votes. They offered to lift travel restrictions for tourists visiting Taiwan, remove tariffs on the import of Taiwanese fruits such as mangos and wax apples and give Taiwan two pandas -- its most cherished endangered species. Note that mangos and wax apples are predominantly farmed in the south, the electoral base of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
It is ironic that when President Chen Shui-bian (
This goes to show that Lien has failed to resolve the discrimination and political gridlock across the Strait, and has only taken China's attempts to help the pan-blue camp buy votes one step further. There is no need to point out that it is pan-blue politicians, who have a deep understanding of Taiwan's political system, who are visiting China to offer tactical advice, teaching the government in Beijing ways to manipulate Taiwan's democratic system and make use of its vote-buying culture to help get the pan-blue camp back into power.
Although Lien has returned, there remains the issue of the pandas. Those who want them and those who don't are already up in arms. Putting aside conservation issues, we believe that as the most fundamental aspects of the cross-strait issue have yet to be resolved, and the "Anti-Secession" Law that authorizes war as a means to settle the cross-strait conflict has not been struck down, it is best if the pandas stay at home.
Otherwise, the growing tensions of the unresolved cross-strait political conflict will be blamed on these two innocent and unsuspecting creatures. There is no reason why they should bear this burden.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS