For the first time in living memory, a Japanese leader has demanded that China apologize, this for anti-Japanese vandalism that has raged through several Chinese cities, including throwing rocks at the Japanese embassy in Beijing while police looked on.
The challenge from Tokyo was yet more evidence of Japan's emergence from the passive and pacifist cocoon in which it had wrapped itself since its crushing defeat in World War II 60 years ago. Since then, Japan has almost always taken what the Japanese call "low posture" in its dealings with China and other Asian nations that it invaded during the days that militarists dominated in Tokyo.
Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura summoned Chinese Ambassador Wang Yi (
The New York Times reported that Wang had not apologized. Press reports from Beijing said Chinese authorities were indignant at the Japanese demand and contended that the Japanese brought the criticism and outbursts on themselves.
Until now, Japan has responded to such confrontations with a public wringing of hands, a symbolic bow from the waist, and a muted expression of regret. Mainly, the Japanese have hoped that the issue at hand would be resolved by having it fade away with the passage of time.
Over the years, the failure of the Japanese to stand up and assert themselves has caused China and South Korea, which has been moving to align itself with China, to become all the more aggressive in their attitude and posture toward Japan.
In addition, Japanese governments have been reluctant to publicize their expressions of regret for the pain and suffering caused by Japanese militarists from 1930 to 1945. Nor have the Japanese sought to take credit for the substantial economic aid they have rendered to China and other Asian nations.
It remains to be seen whether Machimura's new posture will be sustained. If it is, that could most likely be attributed to a generational change in Japan. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Foreign Minister Machimura, and many other Japanese political leaders comprise a true postwar generation of Japanese who have no personal memory of World War II . Japanese in this generation appear to feel less obligated to take "low posture" toward other Asians.
Another leader, Shinzo Abe, of the Liberal Democratic Party, took a position on a TV program last Sunday that would have been unthinkable five years ago, pointing to anger over internal Chinese problems as causing the outbursts against Japan.
"Japan is an outlet to vent that anger," Abe was quoted in the New York Times.
Because of the anti-Japanese education there, it's easy to light the fire of these demonstrations and, because of the Internet, it's easy to assemble a lot of people.
China's rulers have been using the anti-Japanese eruptions, which could have occurred only with government approval in China, to divert attention from issues such as widespread unemployment and under employment. About 40 percent of the Chinese labor force is either out of work or working only enough to get by.
About 125 million people in China, a group as large as the population of Japan, have been reported to be in motion every day looking for work. Peasants have repeatedly rioted in rural areas.
Among the immediate issues that have stirred anti-Japanese demonstrations, which included charging into department stores to sweep Japanese goods off the shelves, has been Tokyo's bid to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council along with the US, Britain, France, Russia, and China.
Beijing has been determined to block that bid and underscored its opposition to Japan's appeal this week by endorsing India's effort to become a permanent member. Brazil and Germany have also sought such membership.
Beijing has vigorously objected to the recent "Common Strategic Objectives" set out by the US and Japan. That agreement includes Japan's assurance that it will help defend the island of Taiwan if China seeks to conquer it by force.
Japan took control of Taiwan after the Sino-Japanese war of 1895. After World War II, Japan renounced sovereignty over Taiwan but did not determine to whom sovereignty passed, contending that was for the victorious allied nations to decide.
Beijing, which asserts that Taiwan belongs to China, has long demanded that Japan recognize China's claim to Taiwan. Japan has refused to comply, which once caused the late premier of China, Chou Enlai(
Richard Halloran is a writer base in Hawaii.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS