The meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (
Before the meeting, Chen presented a gift to Soong. Inscribed on it was the Chinese characters for "sincerity." In response to Chen's courtesy, Soong gave the president a colored glass snail and made some polite remarks. But reading between the lines, we can assume "those who came were not friendly; those who are friendly did not come."
After the meeting, Chen and Soong signed a 10-point consensus. In the statement, the president acknowledges the status of the Republic of China (ROC) and commits not to declaring independence, change the national title, push the "state-to-state" dictum in the ROC Constitution or launch a referendum on the unification-independence issue. The statement leaves Taiwan entangled with the ROC, and the ROC with the People's Republic of China. His commitment has confused the international community, and has placated the pan-blue camp. But it was a slap in the face of those who wish to change the nation's name and create a new constitution.
As for the proposed direct cargo flights, following up on the "successful model of the chartered passenger flights" during the Lunar New Year, what is the definition of "successful" anyway? From the aspect of opening commercial routes across the Strait, the model was certainly successful. But, from the aspect of effective management, the model failed, as foreign maids and tour groups were also allowed to board the flights intended for Taiwanese businesspeople alone.
After the legislative elections in December, the PFP lost 12 seats, the poorest performance of any party. But as the situation changes, the DPP has been flirting with the PFP to lure it over to its side, while the KMT is also casting friendly glances at its pan-blue ally. So the party is gaining advantage from both sides. The meeting with Chen boosted Soong's value even more.
Although KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
But it is absolutely appropriate for the pan-green camp's supporters to advise Chen with Lien's words.
What did Chen gain from the meeting? Undoubtedly, his campaign promise of making a new constitution by 2006 and implementing it by 2008 will not be carried out. What did he gain in exchange for showing his goodwill by admitting that the ROC is in fact the "greatest common denominator" for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? Only Soong's self-satisfied claim that independence is not an option.
I do not intend to blame Soong, because he has not changed. He has not altered his ideals opposing independence or promoting unification under the "one China" roof. What has changed is Chen, who has turned from a promoter of national title rectification and a new constitution into a protector of the ROC.
The meeting cruelly shows that Chen is leaning towards Soong, while Soong is leaning towards the ROC. Through the meeting, the ROC has become the biggest winner while Taiwan has become the biggest loser.
Pathetically, the winner is still a loser unable to go its own way in the world.
Chang Kuo-tsai is vice secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors. TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS