President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) remark last week that "not even former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) would be able to change the national title at present" has sparked harsh criticism from the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and pro-independence groups. Several of Chen's advisors submitted their resignations to protest Chen's endorsement of a 10-point consensus with People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) last month.
Chen's confession that during the remainder of his second presidential term, political reality has rejected the idea of pushing forward the movement of changing the national title and enacting a new constitution. But his supporter base felt betrayed because it contradicted what Chen has pledged before.
To leave a legacy as a capable leader, Chen has no choice but to redefine his role, identify his goals, and implement them step by step.
Domestically, Chen must strike a balance between diverse social forces and forge a unified nation. China's growing influence and the long biased image of Taiwan as a "troublemaker" in the Strait could enable Chen to re-establish his role as a defender of regional peace and stability.
The Chen administration's continued peace gestures to China with regard to implementing the direct Lunar New Year charter flights for China-based Taiwanese businesspeople was a manifestation of breaking the ice in the cross-strait standoff.
Under such circumstances, Chen must react to the criticism made by pro-independence fundamentalists that his rapprochement with the opposition and Beijing sells out the interests of the Taiwanese people.
While admitting the moves toward name rectification and a new constitution are not achievable in the near future, Chen's aim now is to bring the nation back to the real world and concentrate on the urgent issues.
To be frank, the whole fiasco was ignited by sentimental rhetoric, rather than by the accusation that Chen has sold out the pro-independence camp by siding with his long-time opponent Soong. Chen would have minimized the backlash from independence fundamentalists if he were more persuasive. However, fantasy is always what we want but reality is essentially what we need.
Since time is not on Chen's side, he must incorporate stronger leadership, determined action, and the art of political bargaining to his governance. Amid tremendous pressures at home and abroad, Chen must be conciliatory without appearing weak; strong without appearing hostile.
In terms of bridging partisan differences and pursuing reconciliation with the opposition, Chen should use a strategy of persuasion and bargaining to search for common ground on key policies. Without making unreasonable concessions, Chen needs to continue to play a "father figure" role and help the public to learn that the country is beset with difficulties.
Therefore, the extent to which political parties could put aside differences and work together to create a better life for Taiwan's 23 million people will lead the country toward the right track.
Chen should keep in mind that maintaining majority support does not mean abandoning one's principles. It means caring enough about how you explain yourself to get the nation behind you. Since Chen took bold steps but didn't explain them properly, he is failing at the art of persuasion.
Chen should take advantage of the nation's desire for an end to partisan wrangling and cross-strait peace and invite leaders from different political parties and social groups to work together. Only by molding a unified Taiwan can we create a strong and democratic country.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS