Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has been appointed premier. We hope he will use the political experience and tolerance that turned Kaohsiung into a "maritime capital" to achieve the new Cabinet's goal of compromise and peace, and that he will put Taiwan on the road toward becoming a maritime nation.
A maritime people are characterized by being flexible, enlightened, adventurous and ready to open up new vistas, and maritime management is closely connected to foreign affairs.
In his The Freedom of the Seas, published in 1609, Hugo Grotius (Huig de Groot) defended the right of his country Holland to navigate the oceans, and established the concept that the seas were open to all, and made every nation treat the ocean as something important and something shared with all other nations.
The US has recognized the importance of this. In the 1940s and the 1970s, and today, the US either announced important maritime policies or passed major legislation establishing relevant committees, all stressing the nation's maritime rights in order to be able to maintain its global status.
We hope that the new Cabinet will continue to work to make Taiwan a maritime nation, while at the same time developing a maritime vision, new thinking and new vistas.
Sea travel and trade have always led to the development of innumerable ports and flourishing civilizations. Ocean settlements have been characterized by a melting together of different societies and cultures.
Over the past 400 years, Taiwan has been influenced by many disruptive forces, which have led to the creation of a multilayered and diversified culture. The question of how to extend these tangible and intangible cultural resources is closely connected to the perpetuation of Taiwan's appeal.
If we want the maritime concept to become deeply planted in the minds of people, people's lifestyles and the ocean must be integrated with each other. In future, the government should set up a corresponding system that continues to explore, re-interpret and nurture a new ethic and culture of "love for the ocean."
The role of ocean produce in a nation's economy cannot be ignored. Using Australia as an example, it has reported 8 percent growth in ocean produce annually, and by 2020, the annual production value of Australia's ocean produce will reach almost A$100 billion.
Kaohsiung harbor, originally built for the ship-breaking and yacht construction industry, has been developed into a harbor for the loading and unloading of containers and oceangoing fishing boats. The question of how Taiwan will be able to continue to display its strength in the fishing, foreign trade, shipping, tourism and biotechnology industries in the future is indeed a difficult issue for a maritime nation. The new government must consider and work hard to find out what Taiwan's maritime niche is.
However, any development of national land and industry must be able to sustain the environment.
Taiwan needs to gradually eliminate pollution and waste emissions, and move toward the goal of creating a sustainable, high-quality environment. Taiwan can start by working with industrial structural adjustments and purification technologies, and choose industries that have low pollution, low water and energy consumption, with high value.
Coastal developments must take environmental concerns into consideration. Concerns for reasonable land-use planning, and ideas such as green national income, or a public suffering index, as well as effective use of incentives, regulations and substitution programs should be encouraged, and thinking should not be stuck inflexibly on industrial technology or a single industry.
The successful experience with the Choutzu Wetland in Kaohsiung will hopefully be expanded to apply to all of Taiwan.
But measures for ocean protection management are still dependent on the government implementing an efficient and integrated system.
In the past, power over Taiwan's maritime matters was divided -- in particular, land and water, and harbor and urban areas were administered separately.
The city of Dunkerque in France provides a good example of integration -- a free port, harbor and city development has been integrated through an industrial environment mechanism in the Flanders-Dunkerque region.
This mechanism makes environmental quality its main concern; pollution prevention, where land use and landscape modifications must be jointly planned, and has been praised highly by the EU.
Hopefully, the new Cabinet will be able to use the harbor-city integration model developed in Kaohsiung in recent years to gradually integrate ocean-related issues such as ocean, coast, fishing, technological R&D and issues over the execution of laws.
All great maritime nations set up institutions in charge of maritime matters. A central organizational basic law should be created and the nation should set up ministries based on real needs.
Kaoshiung has set up the nation's first Maritime Bureau, but there is still no corresponding national authority. If Taiwan wants to effectively manage ocean and coastal matters, new consideration should be given to a maritime authority dealing with maritime rights and connected from the central government down to local governments in order to make Taiwan exist in unison with the ocean and to build a sustainable homeland.
Chiau Wen-yan is president of Foundation of Ocean Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS