China has announced that its proposed anti-secession law will be enacted in March at the meeting of the National People's Congress. The details of the anti-secession law have yet to be released and are currently still considered secret, but Beijing has leaked some information through various channels that the law targets Taiwan and its independence activists. It will be used against anyone who propagates the idea of Taiwan's independence -- even outside China. Once this law is passed, any Taiwanese national at home or overseas could become a potential target of this law.
There has been a conspicuous lack of action taken by Taiwanese authorities to safeguard the security and freedom of Taiwanese people. Thus far, the Mainland Affairs Council has been the only government agency to come forward and call on Beijing not to enact the anti-secession law. It is worrying to think about how our government remains clueless about what to do in the face of this threat.
The enactment of the anti-secession law will certainly have repercussions for the Asia Pacific region. Although this law primarily targets Taiwan, China is also involved in other territorial conflicts.
Beijing, for example routinely bickers with Japan over the disputed Tiaoyutai (Senkaku) islands, a thought to be rich in oil reserves. India, too, does not see eye to eye with China on the border between these two countries. Vietnam and the Philippines have clashed with China over the Spratly Islands.
No one can guarantee that one day China will not extend the application of its anti-secession and use it as a pretext to attack Japan, India, Vietnam or the Philippines. If this happens, the prosperity and stability of the Asian Pacific region, and the leading role the US has been playing in this region will face a tough challenge.
China's unilateral proposal to enact the anti-secession law has encroached on the rights and interests of all Taiwanese people, unilaterally changed the status quo across the Taiwan Strait, and constitutes a new strategy by Beijing of using a legal apparatus to coerce Taiwan.
Therefore, the government should take active measures to ensure that the nation's sovereignty is not encroached upon, and to explain to the world what harm this anti-secession will do. The legislature should also enact an "anti-annexation" law or hold a referendum to counterbalance China's tyrannous act and reject the bellicose and chauvinist regime Beijing.
Wu Shuh-min is chairman of the Taiwan Society, North.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS