The outcome of the US presidential election shows that the governing and opposition parties in the US still have major differences. Yet, in dealing with issues regarding national security, the US Congress, regardless of party affiliation, is united against external threats. On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly supported a resolution (411-3) condemning the EU's intention to lift its arms embargo on China.
The resolution stated that China has been stepping up its military buildup, including the deployment of hundreds of missiles targeting Taiwan, and that China's arms manufacturers transferred military technology to Iran. Therefore, the EU's intention to lift its arms embargo will jeopardize Taiwan's military as well as US forces in Asia.
The US State Department recently warned the EU not to lift the embargo lest this endanger international security. In addition, former CIA director James Woolsey recently said in testimony to the the House of Representatives that he considers China a major threat to the US. Faced with internal problems, an authoritarian regime such as China would seek to divert internal pressures by targeting an enemy. The easiest enemies for China are Taiwan and the US.
During his testimony, Woolsey pointed out that Beijing's latest defense white paper, China's National Defense in 2004, released in December, described in detail Beijing's hostility towards Washington, as well as how the People's Liberation Army is striving to modernize. Woolsey said that this is a serious problem caused by the Chinese regime, and that the Chinese leaders are nervous, as those without legitimacy are always nervous. Otherwise, how can anyone explain their relentless attacks against the Falun Gong?
Woolsey said that tens or even hundreds of millions of people in China are unemployed. Beijing's leaders are paying particular attention to the matter, because social unrest will threaten their ability to rule. When autocrats face social unrest, they often try to find a foreign enemy for the public to focus on. Naturally, the most convenient enemies are Taiwan, and the US which protects it.
China is already a leading nuclear power, and is rapidly modernizing its military. The US should be cautious about this. While handling the war in Iraq, it should not ignore the possibility of a showdown in the Taiwan Strait.
The US Congress, the State Department and the US intelligence community appear to be in general agreement about China. During the Clinton administration, the US adopted a policy of engagement and treated China as a strategic partner. After the spy plane incident of April 2001, the US started to perceive China as a strategic rival. Subsequently, there was a re-emergence of engagement because of Washington's need for Chinese support for its war on terror, its actions in Afghanistan and efforts to curb North Korea's nuclear-weapons program.
Now, however, there is a growing current of opinion demanding that Washington be wary of the potential threat posed by China. This is a practical and far-sighted strategy.
Although China and the US are separated by the vastness of the Pacific Ocean, many people see clearly the nature and direction of Sino-US relations. China and Taiwan are separated only by the Taiwan Strait. Beijing also has 706 missiles targeting Taiwan. Why are there are still so many people who are uncertain whether China sees Taiwan as a threat or a partner?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS