The Fifth Legislative Yuan came to an end yesterday after an all-night marathon. The political fallout of the presidential and legislative elections meant this legislature was rife with inter-party opposition, boycotts and deadlock, and it is difficult to be satisfied with the quality of debate or the efficiency of the legislative process.
Although the legislature met for 28 hours on its final day, many bills were still left unattended to. Only 56 bills were passed during the whole session. Neither the organic law of the Executive Yuan (
Since a legislative session cannot be extended, the next legislature must start anew, and society as a whole must pay the price for the postponement of reforms. Such lack of efficiency is unacceptable in a modern society.
One bill that was passed earlier in the session was the controversial March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute" (
Then there was the legislature's refusal to review and confirm nominees to the Control Yuan, a move that violates the Constitution and the duties of legislators. It means that the Control Yuan will not be formed within the legally stipulated time, and this still has to be dealt with.
In terms of budget scrutiny, opposition legislators obstructed and voted down requests to include the NT$610.8 billion special arms budget in the legislative agenda. This will not only demoralize the military but is detrimental to national security. The international community will be right to be skeptical of our determination to defend ourselves if law-makers are reluctant to purchase advanced weapons. This could further strain relations with Washington.
As the political stalemate between the governing and opposition parties remains, the opposition abused their legislative majority by slashing the government's annual revenue request by NT$110 billion, almost causing a budget deficit of NT$70 billion. Thanks to the timely intervention of Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jing-pyng (
The deliberate obstruction by the opposition parties of the budget will cause the deficit to grow and will affect the privatization of state-run enterprises. Even more vicious is the retaliatory manner in which the government and opposition approached the budget.
Because the pan-blue legislators were unhappy with the grand justices ruling on the 319 committee, they revoked the professional payment for judges listed in the budget. The Government Information Office's miscellaneous funds were also rejected because broadcasting channels are to be restructured. There was even a rumor that four lawmakers facing charges of electoral fraud had offered to support various budget allocations if the charges were dropped.
The government, the lawmakers and society are all losers with the closing of the Fifth Legislative Yuan. Hopefully President Chen Shui-bian (
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,