Judging from the way things look, there will be no Control Yuan members reporting for duty for a while. The pan-blue legislative caucuses yesterday still refused to even review the nominations made by President Chen Shui-bian (
What is so ridiculous about this whole thing is not that the pan-blues are unhappy with the list of nominees presented for its approval; after all, it is virtually impossible to come up with a list that is acceptable to all. The puzzling thing is this: The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party do not even want to look at the list. They have thus far abused their legislative majority by refusing to even place the review of the nominations on the agenda.
If they think that any particular nominees are ill-qualified or if they simply don't like someone, they can just vote "no" to these individuals' nominations. As a matter of fact, if they are so unhappy with the entire list, they can reject each and every nominee.
What this really amounts to is a refusal on the part of the pan-blue legislators to perform their duty to review and approve or disapprove the president's nominations. According to Article 7 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution, members of the Control Yuan are to be chosen by nomination by the president and with the consent of the Legislative Yuan. In other words, the Constitution stipulates that the Legislative Yuan must participate in the decision-making process for the appointment of Control Yuan members. While there is no requirement that the legislature must give its consent, it cannot refuse flat-out to even review the nominations.
Leaving aside the issue of the constitutionality of the pan-blue lawmakers' conduct, they have also betrayed the voters' confidence and trust by refusing to perform their duty.
Moreover, between the scenario in which the pan-blues simply reject the candidates they feel are ill-qualified and then have the president make alternative nominations for just those vacancies, on the one hand, and the scenario in which the president resubmits a totally new list that is acceptable to the pan-blue camp, the end result will be pretty much the same, except that the second scenario will make the president look bad -- like a schoolboy being instructed to redo his homework.
Actually, since his election Chen has made many progressive reforms to the manner in which Control Yuan nominees are produced. In the past, the president made the decision himself, behind closed doors. Chen has implemented a system in which others can also make recommendations, after which special committees are established by the president to review these recommendations. The entire nomination process is highly transparent. Under the circumstances, it is indeed difficult to imagine that Chen's list could be unacceptable in its entirety.
The public has the most to lose due to such unreasonable bickering between politicians. As a result of the pan-blue lawmakers' refusal to perform their duty, several important national examinations -- including the licensing examinations for doctors, nurses and technicians, may be postponed, since legally speaking these tests must be monitored by members of the Control Yuan. It is truly regretful that the pan-blues have failed to place the public interest above all else.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS