Ban should cover `dual use'
The EU's plan to develop a "code of conduct" before lifting the arms embargo imposed against China simply will not work ("Arms Ban on China to be Lifted," Jan. 14, page 1). Once the weapons are sold to China, how can EU nations interfere in its internal affairs -- and how will the Chinese military use it?
The US, which opposed the EU's move, should have learned a painful lesson from its own sales of "dual-use" technologies (which have civilian and military implications) to ostensibly civilian organizations and academic institutions in China: supercomputers and rocket and satellite technologies wound up in military-controlled front companies or field sites of military regions.
The EU should not delude itself and risk a major confrontation with the US. The EU can sell other products and services to China.
Vincent Wang
Richmond, Virgina
Exclusion is an outrage
The tragedies caused by the devastating tsunami that struck Southeast Asia have raised an all-out relief effort from around the globe. Taiwan -- itself a weathered victim of natural disasters -- and its people have once again shown their sincere philanthropy toward tsunami victims by emptying their pockets and gathering essential food and medical supplies for the affected countries.
Unfortunately, Taiwanese's relief supplies have been kept at bay, and Taiwan, even as one of the major contributors, has been denied representation in conferences coordinating relief efforts, simply because of the unjustified and inhumane pressure from one of the members of the UN. Such an act not only hurts the feeling of the people of Taiwan but also affects the very survival of the tsunami victims.
As dismaying as it is, this turn of events is not new to Taiwanese. Two years ago, when Taiwan was under the full-scale assault of the SARS virus originating in China, the very same country claiming to represent Taiwan did its best to keep the World Health Organization from delivering critical samples to Taiwan for establishing diagnostic protocols.
Such an evil deed was by no means less brutal than the gassing of the Kurdish by former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and deserves the harshest condemnation by the global community. However, the UN's inability to resolve international disputes and enforce resolutions continues to encourage the display of barbarian behaviors by rogue nations.
The UN and its affiliated organizations' negligence in acknowledging Taiwan as a sovereign political entity was once again shown in an article published in the September 2004 issue of National Geographic, authored by the director of the UN Secretariat for Disaster Reduction, Salvano Briceno.
In the article Briceno listed the seven deadliest quakes from the past 30 years, including 2002 Molise earthquake in Italy that killed 29 people and 1994 Northridge earthquake in California that claimed 58 victims. As unbelievable as it is, the list doesn't include the killer quake that rocked Taiwan on Sept. 21, 1999, claiming more than 2,400 lives, including those of my father-in-law and grandmother-in-law, and causing a direct property loss of around US$10 billion.
The failure of Briceno's staff in recognizing the level of damage caused by the quake, which seems to imply that Briceno and his staff have deemed the lives perished in Taiwan unworthy of mentioning and the lessons so traumatically experienced by Taiwanese irrelevant to the glorious goal of "Disaster Reduction" of his organization, is puzzling and extremely disheartening to the families of the 921 victims.
We may naively hope that the omission of the 921 earthquake information from the article was a result of unintentional ignorance on the part of the UN Secretariat rather than an act of deliberate negligence. Unfortunately, the reality indicates otherwise.
The failure of the UN and its affiliated organizations in recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign state and the continuing the exclusion of Taiwan's participation in nonpolitical activities such as tsunami relief, as if Taiwan does not exist on the surface of the globe, will not only encourage further aggressive behaviors by rogues but also hurt the people of Taiwan and prove a disservice to humanity in general.
After all, tsunamis and viruses are politically and ethnically blind.
Lin Sung-chyr
Taichung
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS