At a time when Taipei is thinking over its international strategy in response to Beijing's proposal of an anti-secession law (反分裂國家法) last month, several local academics and experts have predicted that China will make concessions on direct cross-strait charter flights for the Lunar New Year holiday -- as this would constitute just a single, insignificant case.
In doing so, China will be able to affect Taiwan's international strategy: just as Taipei is firing back at the proposed legislation, it will be accepting a symbolic reconciliation between the two sides when Chinese charter flights arrive in Taiwan.
Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) took the initiative by first making a statement on May 17 on the anti-secession law, and he is no longer responding passively to Taiwan's moves. Meanwhile, he is playing a soft tune on non-political issues to attract the support of the Taiwanese people and the international community.
When Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫), the late chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), fell seriously ill last year, Taipei wished to invite the chairman of China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS), Wang Daohan (汪道涵), to visit him. Beijing thinks highly of Koo, and clearly knows that another Koo-Wang meeting could have reduced tensions across the Strait. But Beijing repeatedly refused Taipei's invitation, due to its rigid political stance.
The condolence message Wang sent after Koo's death is a reflection of their personal friendship. But it also shows that, if the necessary moral courage is absent, one will be destined to yield to Beijing's strategic arrangement.
China's creation of the anti-secession law shows that Hu wants to take the initiative to restrain Taiwan from a plan to create a new constitution through a referendum next year. China has been preparing the legislation for a long while, but claims that the proposed law is passive and defensive. China is obviously trying to prevent not only formal Taiwan independence, but also US interference.
After hurting the feelings of the Taiwanese people with this strategic arrangement, a ray of hope over charter flights has appeared. Unfortunately, Beijing's political maneuvering can be seen behind its goodwill.
According to a poll on the anti-secession law taken by the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank on Dec. 31, more than half of those questioned think that the law may restrict their expression of opinion on unification and independence, block the resumption of cross-strait talks and even increase tension across the Strait. About 70 percent of the respondents think that Taiwan's international space will be further oppressed.
About 80 percent of respondents objected to the legislation, while as many as 88 percent thought that Taiwan's political parties should give up their power struggles in the face of the legislation. Perhaps it is beyond Beijing's imagination that the law might promote unity among Taiwan's major parties.
Although Taipei wants to strike back, it is under pressure from Washington. But if no action is taken, this will be interpreted as tacit recognition of Beijing's action.
Taipei has purposely defined Beijing's move as an attempt to unilaterally change the status quo. US President George W. Bush's government did not criticize Beijing for the proposed law, unlike its response to Taipei's holding of a so-called defensive referendum last year.
Ironically, Taipei now has to swallow the insult, accept the delayed charter flight plan designed by Beijing and study the proposed two-way direct flights between Taiwan and Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Although Taipei is relatively passive at present, it should at least express its opinion on the planning of destinations for the flights. That would be fair play.
The cross-strait situations seems hopeless and depressing at times. But it is full of all kinds of possibilities and turning points. Real peace is surely impossible. But it is not easy for a war to break out either. Both sides have to seize this opportunity and make every effort to boost the economy. Besides, at least Taiwan, China and the US do have something in common: avoiding the use of force in the Strait.
After the Lunar New Year charter flights, and to mark the 10th anniversary of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin's (江澤民) "eight points" on the Taiwan issue, Hu may call on the two sides to jointly build a framework for cross-strait peace and stability.
Despite a few methods proposed to improve cross-strait relations (such as negotiation mechanisms and convenient charter flights for passengers and cargo), there is still a very long way to go reach true reconciliation. The charter flights give only minor relief in a situation of major tension. Although they will have no significant impact on the overall framework, we hope that such tiny drips can in the end break this stone.
At a time when China is using the dual tactics of tightening its stance on major issues while loosening it on minor ones, Taiwan is planning to establish a committee for cross-strait peace and development. Since the Taiwanese people are tired of inter-party struggles, the government should unite with the opposition and social elite to seek reconciliation, and give full play to professionalism. This is also how we can pay our supreme respects to Koo, who was the real advocate of the committee.
Lin Cheng-yi is the director of the Institute of European and American Studies at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS