In their masterpiece on political campaign strategy, James Carville and Paul Begala provide politicians with a dozen winning secrets. Among them, the key is to "buck up, suck up, and come back when you foul up."
As political consultants for former US president Bill Clinton, Carville and Begala remind politicians of what to do next when they win and how to recover when you really screw up.
The philosophy is simple but frequently neglected: Once you've won, the goal is not to gloat, it's to win again. Do everything you can to set yourself up for another victory. Do nothing that will make your next effort more difficult. But if you mess up, take responsibility, thereby demonstrating that even when you fouled up, you're responsible. Accepting responsibility is better than taking blame.
The pan-blue camp's complacent attitude about its victory in last month's legislative elections -- as well as its leaders' moves to take advantage of the de facto majority to attempt to blackmail the Chen Shui-bian (
The political wrestling among the blue camp also signified their incoherence, especially when it comes to past campaign rivalries and future cooperation.
Not only did the People First Party (PFP) pour cold water on the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) proposal to merge quickly and instead "walk on its own road," their under-the-table dealings with the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have opened the possibility of party cooperation that cross blue and green lines.
While Chen resigned the DPP chairmanship to take responsibility for the party's failure to secure a majority in the legislature, it revealed a timely and skillful adjustment of Chen's leadership strategy to clear the battlefield and move to the next one.
Clearly Chen has a well-calculated agenda in mind. Chen not only took responsibility for his party's poor performance in an unprecedented and modest way, he also urged party members to engage in self-examination.
Later, in his New Year's address to the nation, Chen stressed the need for reconciliation and dialogue between the opposing camps and took steps toward reconciliation and cooperation needed to power the country toward reinvigorating the economy and upgrading its national competitiveness. Chen also left room for party-to-party negotiations on key personnel arrangements and policy decisions by emphasizing that "politics is an art of possibilities."
In order to rebuild his leadership, Chen successfully minimized the "lame-duck effect" by appointing Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Tseng-chang(蘇貞昌) as the acting DPP chairman and began to groom senior DPP official and Kaohsiung City mayor Frank Hsieh.
In terms of regaining control of political agenda, Chen also offered an olive branch to the opposition party leaders by opening chances of policy dialogue and negotiation. Most importantly, Chen echoed the pubic by generating an urgent need for the nation to put aside political finger-pointing and partisan disputes.
While Lien and his followers are still obsessed with the presidential election results and put all their hopes on what they call "the new legitimacy," their chances might have slipped away as the DPP reorients its strategy to meet the new political climate.
During elections, the trick is to not get so carried away with being gracious in victory that you forget what you are fighting for. All victories are fleeting. When you win one, move quickly and decisively to consolidate your gains. No one is ever sustained by past glory.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS