On Wednesday, the Executive Yuan approved a bill to revise the Referendum Law (
There are three main aspects of the bill. It lowers the threshold required for the passage of referendums and initiatives, and removes a provision in the bill which would give voters the right to an initiative with respect to changing the country's name and the national flag.
The new provision also gives voters the right to approve via referendum any legal changes in national boundaries. It would also change the required 50 percent approval of all registered voters and replace it with the approval of a majority of voters who actually voted -- ?as long as it constitutes 25 percent of registered voters.
Despite pan-blue reservations, referendums serve many purposes beyond accomplishing "Taiwan's independence." Groups have social causes that they wish to materialize through referendums. By setting unreachable thresholds, these groups are virtually excluded. This is why despite the reduced thresholds, many social groups feel they have not been lowered sufficiently.
Yesterday, both the Taipei Society (
Even to the pan-blue camp, the need for such high thresholds no longer seems critical now that the Executive Yuan no longer seeks to give people the right to change the country's name and the national flag through initiatives.
This of course is a major concession on the part of the Chen government, and risks enraging conservatives and hardliners within the pan-green camp. This may be part of the reason that former president Lee Teng-hui (
As for the new proposal to approve changes to national boundaries through referendums, many believe this is a move to counter China's anti-secession law.
Presumably, in the event of Chinese military aggression justified by law Taiwan may be able to declare this a change of national boundaries or the exclusion of the Chinese Mainland from the definition of national boundaries. This would not impact the status quo of the Republic of China's (ROC) sovereignty, and technically it would still conform with the US policy of "maintaining the status quo." It also shouldn't violate any basic principles of the pan-blue camp.
On the other hand it would make a Chinese invasion of Taiwan an invasion of foreign soil. The new bill has thus far not been well-received by the pan-blue camp. Not only has Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
The major gaps in interpreting the Executive Yuan's move suggests that a sense of distrust continues to permeate both the pan-green and pan-blue camps.
Until both sides can learn to believe in the goodwill of the other camp, there's still a long way to go in terms of political reconciliation and cooperation in Taiwan.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS