World leaders are gathering in Jakarta, Indonesia today for a one-day summit to discuss the global relief operation for the South Asian tsunami. Even though Taiwan is a major financial contributor to this effort, it has not been invited to participate in the summit. In response, Taiwan's Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (
Taiwan was reportedly not invited because it is not a member of the UN. If we can reduce such political interference, all members of the global village will be able to better cooperate with one another. Taiwan should call on the UN and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to acknowledge that there is no distinction between nations when it comes to relief operations. After all, we do not know where the next earthquake or tsunami will hit.
Taiwan is a major aid contributor and is also geographically close to the affected region, so the international community should not bar Taiwan's participation in the meeting. As a member of the international community, Taiwan is dutybound to make a contribution to the international disaster relief effort. Members of charitable groups in Taiwan defied cold winter weather to solicit donations in the nation's cities. Yesterday, donations exceeded NT$200 million. But as a member of that international community, Taiwan also has the right to learn from the relief effort.
The Department of Health has called for a team of medical personnel to travel to the disaster-hit region to carry out disease prevention activities, and the government has announced that the national treasury will allocate US$50 million to disaster relief. While Taiwan may be torn by internal political struggles, government and opposition groups are cooperating in the disaster relief effort in an unprecedented manner.
This recent disaster reminds people in Taiwan of the 921 earthquake in 1999, which left central Taiwan in ruins and claimed about 2,070 lives. The work of reconstruction over these past few years has been a valuable experience that can be shared with tsunami-devastated South Asian countries.
According to Kuo Hsu-sung (
An international disaster relief effort such as this cannot escape political interference, and Taiwan has been deprived not only of the chance to participate in the summit, but also to learn from the experience. Is this not a truly cold-blooded way for the international community to treat Taiwan? During the international SARS epidemic in 2003, all countries were given assistance by the WHO, with the exception of Taiwan, to whom such assistance was denied.
On the day of the summit, we do not wish to speculate on the motives of the organizers, but we truly hope that the question of Taiwan's duty and its right to international participation be resolved, so that Taiwan does not become yet another victim of the Dec. 26 tsunami.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS