World leaders are gathering in Jakarta, Indonesia today for a one-day summit to discuss the global relief operation for the South Asian tsunami. Even though Taiwan is a major financial contributor to this effort, it has not been invited to participate in the summit. In response, Taiwan's Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (
Taiwan was reportedly not invited because it is not a member of the UN. If we can reduce such political interference, all members of the global village will be able to better cooperate with one another. Taiwan should call on the UN and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to acknowledge that there is no distinction between nations when it comes to relief operations. After all, we do not know where the next earthquake or tsunami will hit.
Taiwan is a major aid contributor and is also geographically close to the affected region, so the international community should not bar Taiwan's participation in the meeting. As a member of the international community, Taiwan is dutybound to make a contribution to the international disaster relief effort. Members of charitable groups in Taiwan defied cold winter weather to solicit donations in the nation's cities. Yesterday, donations exceeded NT$200 million. But as a member of that international community, Taiwan also has the right to learn from the relief effort.
The Department of Health has called for a team of medical personnel to travel to the disaster-hit region to carry out disease prevention activities, and the government has announced that the national treasury will allocate US$50 million to disaster relief. While Taiwan may be torn by internal political struggles, government and opposition groups are cooperating in the disaster relief effort in an unprecedented manner.
This recent disaster reminds people in Taiwan of the 921 earthquake in 1999, which left central Taiwan in ruins and claimed about 2,070 lives. The work of reconstruction over these past few years has been a valuable experience that can be shared with tsunami-devastated South Asian countries.
According to Kuo Hsu-sung (
An international disaster relief effort such as this cannot escape political interference, and Taiwan has been deprived not only of the chance to participate in the summit, but also to learn from the experience. Is this not a truly cold-blooded way for the international community to treat Taiwan? During the international SARS epidemic in 2003, all countries were given assistance by the WHO, with the exception of Taiwan, to whom such assistance was denied.
On the day of the summit, we do not wish to speculate on the motives of the organizers, but we truly hope that the question of Taiwan's duty and its right to international participation be resolved, so that Taiwan does not become yet another victim of the Dec. 26 tsunami.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS