World leaders are gathering in Jakarta, Indonesia today for a one-day summit to discuss the global relief operation for the South Asian tsunami. Even though Taiwan is a major financial contributor to this effort, it has not been invited to participate in the summit. In response, Taiwan's Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (
Taiwan was reportedly not invited because it is not a member of the UN. If we can reduce such political interference, all members of the global village will be able to better cooperate with one another. Taiwan should call on the UN and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to acknowledge that there is no distinction between nations when it comes to relief operations. After all, we do not know where the next earthquake or tsunami will hit.
Taiwan is a major aid contributor and is also geographically close to the affected region, so the international community should not bar Taiwan's participation in the meeting. As a member of the international community, Taiwan is dutybound to make a contribution to the international disaster relief effort. Members of charitable groups in Taiwan defied cold winter weather to solicit donations in the nation's cities. Yesterday, donations exceeded NT$200 million. But as a member of that international community, Taiwan also has the right to learn from the relief effort.
The Department of Health has called for a team of medical personnel to travel to the disaster-hit region to carry out disease prevention activities, and the government has announced that the national treasury will allocate US$50 million to disaster relief. While Taiwan may be torn by internal political struggles, government and opposition groups are cooperating in the disaster relief effort in an unprecedented manner.
This recent disaster reminds people in Taiwan of the 921 earthquake in 1999, which left central Taiwan in ruins and claimed about 2,070 lives. The work of reconstruction over these past few years has been a valuable experience that can be shared with tsunami-devastated South Asian countries.
According to Kuo Hsu-sung (
An international disaster relief effort such as this cannot escape political interference, and Taiwan has been deprived not only of the chance to participate in the summit, but also to learn from the experience. Is this not a truly cold-blooded way for the international community to treat Taiwan? During the international SARS epidemic in 2003, all countries were given assistance by the WHO, with the exception of Taiwan, to whom such assistance was denied.
On the day of the summit, we do not wish to speculate on the motives of the organizers, but we truly hope that the question of Taiwan's duty and its right to international participation be resolved, so that Taiwan does not become yet another victim of the Dec. 26 tsunami.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS