I read with alarm your article "Life Not Easy for Foreign Spouses" by Cody Yiu (Nov. 9, page 2). The quote attributed to Kathy Ke, "These foreign spouses, who are often the main caregivers at home, have little idea about how to raise their children," is at best absurd. After all, Taiwan is not the only place in the world where children are raised. And it was disturbing to see the word "interracial" (rather than "intercultural") used to describe marriages that are overwhelmingly to a spouse from Vietnam, the Philippines or other countries in east Asia and southeast Asia.
To understand how offensive these sentiments are, consider what the reaction would be in Taiwan if a US or European expert were to make similar denigrating remarks about Taiwanese immigrants.
I was particularly disappointed that the article mentioned only challenges in intercultural families, and failed to mention the significant advantages of multiculturalism for Taiwan at a time when the country seeks to be more international and hopes for greater international recognition. One hopes that Taiwan would welcome those seeking to make a new life -- much as those from Taiwan hope to be welcomed when they travel and live in other countries.
Doug Tygar
Berkeley, California
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS