New curriculum ideas
I am a lecturer at National Taiwan University (NTU), but I also have had the opportunity to teach toddlers, elementary, high school and college students over the past two years.
Regarding English instruction, it seems a pity that only parents who can afford Ivy-League tuition rates can give their children English instruction from an early age. If the administration desires a bilingual population, English should be a standard part of Taiwan's national curriculum as early as pre-school or kindergarten, and with no bureaucratic obstacles.
By raising a generation of bilingual Taiwanese students, the human resources of Taiwan would be increased a thousandfold. The need for bilingual Chinese and English speakers will only increase exponentially in the future.
It is a myth that children cannot learn both languages simultaneously, and at an age like pre-school they can learn basic conversational English simply through play while they are still blissfully unaware of concerns like competitive academic achievement.
Next I want to address the issue of "In what context should we teach Taiwanese history?" Currently, even NTU students rarely know much about this rich and fascinating subject. They just learn about China, and still memorize dry facts about every Chinese province.
One suggestion for developing a history curriculum is to take Taiwan's demographics into account. History books could still begin with the earliest civilizations and their accomplishments in China, but then move on to a section on Taiwan specifically. Then they could show how immigration developed from Fukien Province, from where a large majority of Taiwanese came.
Contemporary accounts, such as Formosa Under the Dutch and Out of China (Jong He's travels in Taiwan), or Through Formosa (an Englishman's account of Taiwan under the Japanese), could give an interesting and fairly accurate picture of Taiwan. Then of course it would only be fair to have a unit to discuss the Aboriginal groups in Taiwan. Asian and world history can be incorporated through the colonizing influence of the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Japanese and the Chinese.
Lastly, I think the national conference on high school curriculum being held in Taipei is making a mistake by modeling Taiwanese education on that of the West by separating students into arts or science specializations. Education would best serve students' interests by allowing them to specialize in two subjects, one in arts and one in sciences.
In the West we create one-sided citizens specializing in one area, when in fact we all are capable of excelling in a combination of subjects in both areas. For example, a person who cannot fathom chemistry may actually excel in physics.
To limit students to one focus would exclude them from areas of study that would benefit them. Imagine that in a well-rounded education, artists also could master a "scientific" field like computer programming.
By allowing multiple specializations, Taiwan's schools would better prepare students to excel in a variety of areas, and this would give them more qualifications in their chosen field.
This is a critical time for a truly holistic education to be developed in Taiwan.
Trista di Genova
National Taiwan University
Put Ma in the saddle
Ever since election night, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and his running mate, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), declared the election results invalid, I have been waiting to see how Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九) -- whom many believe will be the KMT's future leader -- would react. I am sure many people who voted for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in this election did so because only the DPP offered a way to move the country forward.
Voters should have choices in democratic societies. Though two slates of candidates ran in the recent election, only one offered a way forward, while the other was really facing backward (the KMT's behavior warrants this remark).
I think Ma could show us the KMT party has a future, and this is a great time for him to show us how he can do the right thing for his party and the country now, under pressure.
I am sure Ma hopes to serve the people as president in the future. Yet do we really want someone who acts this way under pressure (especially toward a greater power) when it comes to relations with China? Come on, KMT, show us you can change the outdated ways of your party and offer the people another choice in future elections.
David Pan
Tainan
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS