New curriculum ideas
I am a lecturer at National Taiwan University (NTU), but I also have had the opportunity to teach toddlers, elementary, high school and college students over the past two years.
Regarding English instruction, it seems a pity that only parents who can afford Ivy-League tuition rates can give their children English instruction from an early age. If the administration desires a bilingual population, English should be a standard part of Taiwan's national curriculum as early as pre-school or kindergarten, and with no bureaucratic obstacles.
By raising a generation of bilingual Taiwanese students, the human resources of Taiwan would be increased a thousandfold. The need for bilingual Chinese and English speakers will only increase exponentially in the future.
It is a myth that children cannot learn both languages simultaneously, and at an age like pre-school they can learn basic conversational English simply through play while they are still blissfully unaware of concerns like competitive academic achievement.
Next I want to address the issue of "In what context should we teach Taiwanese history?" Currently, even NTU students rarely know much about this rich and fascinating subject. They just learn about China, and still memorize dry facts about every Chinese province.
One suggestion for developing a history curriculum is to take Taiwan's demographics into account. History books could still begin with the earliest civilizations and their accomplishments in China, but then move on to a section on Taiwan specifically. Then they could show how immigration developed from Fukien Province, from where a large majority of Taiwanese came.
Contemporary accounts, such as Formosa Under the Dutch and Out of China (Jong He's travels in Taiwan), or Through Formosa (an Englishman's account of Taiwan under the Japanese), could give an interesting and fairly accurate picture of Taiwan. Then of course it would only be fair to have a unit to discuss the Aboriginal groups in Taiwan. Asian and world history can be incorporated through the colonizing influence of the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Japanese and the Chinese.
Lastly, I think the national conference on high school curriculum being held in Taipei is making a mistake by modeling Taiwanese education on that of the West by separating students into arts or science specializations. Education would best serve students' interests by allowing them to specialize in two subjects, one in arts and one in sciences.
In the West we create one-sided citizens specializing in one area, when in fact we all are capable of excelling in a combination of subjects in both areas. For example, a person who cannot fathom chemistry may actually excel in physics.
To limit students to one focus would exclude them from areas of study that would benefit them. Imagine that in a well-rounded education, artists also could master a "scientific" field like computer programming.
By allowing multiple specializations, Taiwan's schools would better prepare students to excel in a variety of areas, and this would give them more qualifications in their chosen field.
This is a critical time for a truly holistic education to be developed in Taiwan.
Trista di Genova
National Taiwan University
Put Ma in the saddle
Ever since election night, when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and his running mate, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), declared the election results invalid, I have been waiting to see how Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九) -- whom many believe will be the KMT's future leader -- would react. I am sure many people who voted for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in this election did so because only the DPP offered a way to move the country forward.
Voters should have choices in democratic societies. Though two slates of candidates ran in the recent election, only one offered a way forward, while the other was really facing backward (the KMT's behavior warrants this remark).
I think Ma could show us the KMT party has a future, and this is a great time for him to show us how he can do the right thing for his party and the country now, under pressure.
I am sure Ma hopes to serve the people as president in the future. Yet do we really want someone who acts this way under pressure (especially toward a greater power) when it comes to relations with China? Come on, KMT, show us you can change the outdated ways of your party and offer the people another choice in future elections.
David Pan
Tainan
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.