Saturday's presidential election had everything. The campaign had divisive and vilifying rhetoric. On the afternoon before the election, the incumbent president and vice-president were shot while campaigning. The campaign featured two referendum questions, which had China raving. The winner defeated the loser by 29,518 votes of 12.9 million cast that were valid. And,
to top it off, the loser proved he lacked leadership by challenging the result without providing any evidence of fraud.
Lien Chan's (連戰) post-election statement proved he lacks the competency to be president. He reacted before the Central Election Commission announced the election results, calling the election unfair. Rather than simply saying the election was close and requesting a recount, he launched into questioning the horrific shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮). Then he and his running mate, James Soong (宋楚瑜), hung around the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Headquarters, where they did nothing to induce calmness among their supporters.
Lien's imputation that the assassination attempt was campaign trickery was ironic to hear for those with long memories in Taiwan. Lien and Soong participated in high government and party positions during the authoritarian period and it was during these periods that the family of Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) was killed, Professor Chen Wen-cheng (陳文成) "fell" to his death, the writer Jiang Nan (江南) murdered in the US and Wu Shu-chen (吳淑珍), President Chen's wife, repeatedly hit by a truck and left a paraplegic. We know, thanks to the FBI, that Taiwan's security agencies committed Jiang Nan's killing in the US and the inability to solve the other murders, even after so long, suggests security agency involvement. If trickery was involved in the recent assassination attempts then Lien and Soong are the more likely perpetrators.
Lien and Soong also conducted an extremely dirty campaign, aided by the pro-blue media. The lies and accusations just kept coming. Lien and Soong told a foreign press conference that the campaign was extremely dirty and that they hoped foreign journalists would know by the end of the press conference who was committing this vilification. Yes, President Chen was not a "pure angel" -- his allusion to Lien Chan beating his wife was unnecessary and degrading. But, at the end of the press conference, the foreign press knew the source of the filth was Lien and Soong themselves.
What of the future? The court process will take place quickly and, unless Lien and Soong can prove the existence of skulduggery, President Chen and Vice-President Lu will have their re-election confirmed. In any case, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has now achieved a true majority of votes, no matter how slim. This is a significant increase from 39.3 percent in the 2000 presidential election and an improvement on the 2001 legislative election. For the legislative election this year, the DPP and the Taiwan Solidarity Union will have to work together to nominate a slate that can win a majority of seats, which would improve government stability.
Hopefully, the dynamics in the KMT will force Lien and Soong from the political stage. At least some KMT supporters considered voting for Chen to help clear the stage of these "yesterday's men." Both have long records of government corruption and neither has shown evidence of any understanding of democracy either in the KMT or in government.
This would allow the Taiwanese members, such as Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng, and the younger Mainlander leaders such as Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
50s or younger, have much more enlightened views of Taiwan and the world. Ideally, they would work closely with the second Chen administration to build a cooperative "win-win" situation in which all would benefit.
China and constitutional reform remain two key issues for the future. China must learn to deal with the reality of Taiwan. This is now an island where "Taiwan identity" has grown
considerably at the expense of "China identity," which has declined precipitously over the past decade. China, however, has its own political problems and it may be that Chinese political forces will hamstring the Hu Jintao (
Constitutional reform is also important. The current Constitution was written in the late 1940s for a dictatorship of half a billion people. Some two-thirds of the Constitution's articles require revision to suit a democracy
of 23 million people. Chen has declared such a new constitution would not change the national name, flag or anthem. That Lien Chan called for a new constitution even faster than Chen proposed (shortly after calling Chen's proposal "boring") indicates that the people in Taiwan widely seek such change.
A second Chen administration will also allow political reform to continue. The president can only appoint two or three people to each ministry, so the reform process has been slow. Many more people are beginning to understand the logic of these reforms.
The second Chen administration is a bonus for Taiwan. The old political leaders will leave the stage and a new Taiwan will continue to emerge. President Chen and his fellow leaders will need to work constructively and
carefully to keep all interested parties, including foreign governments, on side. But the people
of Taiwan, and the people of the Asia-Pacific region, will all benefit from Taiwan's continuing democratic development.
Bruce Jacobs is Professor of Asian Languages and Studies and Director of the Taiwan Research Unit at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS