A matter of perspective
Very rarely do I read something as ridiculous as Allen Yu's bold statement: "In China, foreigners can travel and communicate with ease" ("End linguistic quarantine," Letters, Sept. 1, page 8).
Either Yu has never been to China, or he's a pan-blue supporter holding romanticized visions of the wonders of the PRC. I have news for Yu. More people in the PRC are illiterate with respect to the English language than in Taiwan. And I mean both on a per capita basis as well as pure numbers. In case Yu never bothered to figure it out, one of the few reasons many US businesses haven't moved to Shanghai and have remained in Hong Kong, for example, is because of the lower standard of English even in an "interna-tional" city such as Shanghai.
And speaking of Hong Kong, it didn't use a Hanyu Pinying when it attracted foreign busi-nesses and capital many de-cades ago. I am still puzzled by Yu's adulation of Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Frankly, changing some street signs overnight isn't going to attract foreign capital. Like many of Ma's policies, it is but a cosmetic window dressing that is a mere attempt to cover up a real problem.
No, Taiwan's ability to attract foreign businesses isn't based on what street signs it uses. Either Yu has never worked for a foreign company, or he's listening to too much propaganda. Foreign businesses look for investment opportunities first, not whether a country uses convenient street signs. If there isn't money to be made, foreign business still won't go to Taiwan, even if everyone speaks perfect English. By contrast, foreign businesses flock to China because of the market, not because the Chinese are great English speakers or are friendly to foreign businesses. Doing business in China, in case Yu never read anything other than pan-blue propaganda, is hardly a cakewalk.
Rather, Taiwan needs to revamp its educational system such that it can provide the higher quality of workers that are attractive to high margin foreign investment. Taiwan is undergoing a period of change. It needs to shift, for example, from a hardware-based economy where it is quickly degenerating into a commodities market to a higher margin services economy where it is not competing on commodities pricing. Changing street signs won't do that overnight. Neither will electing a mayor that speaks passable English but lacks substance in policy.
If anything, the debate over street signs is little more than a politicization of the Taiwan Strait problem. And more matter how much Yu worships Ma, the changing of street signs is a cosmetic change.
Ryan Shih
Hong Kong
Allen Yu correctly pointed out that Taiwan's Romanization is a mess. However, instead of blaming the central government for adopting the Tongyong system, he should have criticized Ma for using the Hanyu system in Taipei. Two systems in a country will never work. They only create confusions and confrontations.
People take it for granted to accept differences among British, American, Canadian and Australian English. There is no such thing as a universal standard for English. People also accept differences between traditional and simplified Chinese characters. As a matter of fact,Tongyong is much easier to learn than Hanyu. If Hanyu is a universal standard, Tongyong is even more qualified to be a universal standard for its simplicity and general applicability.
People in Taiwan never had any linguistic choice before. They were forced to study Japanese for 50 years (1895-1945) and Mandarin for 58 years (1945-present). No one should import Hanyu from China and impose it on Taiwan again. Since Taiwan has decided to adopt Tongyong, let's all respect this unprecedented lingustic choice by Taiwan, support it wholeheartedly and use it consistently.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from