Recent news reports said both China and Taiwan are streamlining their armed forces. Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
Both sides want to streamline their armed forces, but that does not necessarily represent a peaceful attitude. The main targets of China's downsizing plan include navy and air force personnel charged with art and entertainment, sports and hygiene work. The plan will reduce military expenditure, but it will not affect combat power. The PLA will still have 1.8 million troops after the downsizing, compared to the 300,000 troops Taipei plans to retain after its cutback. China's defense budget for next year is US$23 billion, but this is an underestimation. Its real defense spending could be as high as US$65 billion -- a far cry from Taiwan's less-than-US$8 billion budget for next year.
Apart from its greatly superior size, the PLA is also rapidly increasing its weapons and equipment. Tai-wan still enjoys a qualitative edge, but both Taiwan-ese and US military experts are worried that the military balance across the Taiwan Strait may tilt by 2005. In light of this, President Chen Shui-bian (
A tilted military balance across the Strait may help boost China's intent to launch a military attack against Taiwan. Jiang also said modern warfare has moved from mechanized to information warfare. China has deployed more than 450 ballistic missiles along its southeast coast, and the number continues to rise by 75 per year. According to the Ministry of National Defense's estimates, Taiwan has the capacity to weather 96 ballistic missile attacks. China has long surpassed that number. In other words, China's missile deployments are not merely meant for Taiwan -- they are also causing anxiety in southeast Asian countries.
Both US and Taiwanese military experts predict that, in the event of a military attack, the PLA will use asymmetrical tactics and use a variety of electronic means to paralyze Taiwan's weapons, communications and computer equipment. Missiles will be used in concert to destroy ground facilities. Such tactics can be executed without using large numbers of troops. China's military streamlining therefore has nothing to do with peace in the Taiwan Strait. Neither Taiwan nor the rest of world should harbor any illusion about this.
A resolution of cross-strait tensions will have to be built on dialogue. Chen has recently announced a three-phase plan for direct transportation links across the Strait, but the problem is that Beijing still harbors hostility towards Taiwan and continues to insist on the "one China" principle as a precondition for any talks. If Beijing can remove this hurdle, this will open the way for pragmatic negotiations on direct links. China also needs to renounce the use of force and sign a cross-strait truce. This will be the only true manifestation of peace in the Strait, which will bring happiness to people on both sides and also contribute to world peace.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS