Recent news reports said both China and Taiwan are streamlining their armed forces. Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
Both sides want to streamline their armed forces, but that does not necessarily represent a peaceful attitude. The main targets of China's downsizing plan include navy and air force personnel charged with art and entertainment, sports and hygiene work. The plan will reduce military expenditure, but it will not affect combat power. The PLA will still have 1.8 million troops after the downsizing, compared to the 300,000 troops Taipei plans to retain after its cutback. China's defense budget for next year is US$23 billion, but this is an underestimation. Its real defense spending could be as high as US$65 billion -- a far cry from Taiwan's less-than-US$8 billion budget for next year.
Apart from its greatly superior size, the PLA is also rapidly increasing its weapons and equipment. Tai-wan still enjoys a qualitative edge, but both Taiwan-ese and US military experts are worried that the military balance across the Taiwan Strait may tilt by 2005. In light of this, President Chen Shui-bian (
A tilted military balance across the Strait may help boost China's intent to launch a military attack against Taiwan. Jiang also said modern warfare has moved from mechanized to information warfare. China has deployed more than 450 ballistic missiles along its southeast coast, and the number continues to rise by 75 per year. According to the Ministry of National Defense's estimates, Taiwan has the capacity to weather 96 ballistic missile attacks. China has long surpassed that number. In other words, China's missile deployments are not merely meant for Taiwan -- they are also causing anxiety in southeast Asian countries.
Both US and Taiwanese military experts predict that, in the event of a military attack, the PLA will use asymmetrical tactics and use a variety of electronic means to paralyze Taiwan's weapons, communications and computer equipment. Missiles will be used in concert to destroy ground facilities. Such tactics can be executed without using large numbers of troops. China's military streamlining therefore has nothing to do with peace in the Taiwan Strait. Neither Taiwan nor the rest of world should harbor any illusion about this.
A resolution of cross-strait tensions will have to be built on dialogue. Chen has recently announced a three-phase plan for direct transportation links across the Strait, but the problem is that Beijing still harbors hostility towards Taiwan and continues to insist on the "one China" principle as a precondition for any talks. If Beijing can remove this hurdle, this will open the way for pragmatic negotiations on direct links. China also needs to renounce the use of force and sign a cross-strait truce. This will be the only true manifestation of peace in the Strait, which will bring happiness to people on both sides and also contribute to world peace.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS