In the powerful Ways and Means Committee of the US House of Representatives (the adjective powerful has long been fused to the committee name), a memorable imbroglio recently shocked the more sensitive denizens of the people's House. "It wasn't a day in which the dialogue amongst us was equal to the challenge of governance," said Representative Nancy Johnson, a Republican. Students of the political language refer to it as "the fruitcake episode."
The Democrats on the committee had staged a walkout to protest a too-speedy markup of a pension bill, leaving behind one member -- Pete Stark, who is given to colorful language -- to delay proceedings. When Stark grew agitated at a ruling by the chairman, Representative Scott McInnis, a Republican, muttered, "Shut up."
This provoked an explosion from the 71-year-old Stark: "Oh, you think you are big enough to make me, you little wimp?" The official transcript continues: "Come over here and make me. I dare you. You little fruitcake." In case his distinguished colleague had not been paying attention, Stark added, "I said you are a fruitcake."
The police were summoned but wanted no part of the brouhaha; reporters delightedly appeared; and lexicographers wondered which insult was the more stinging -- wimp or fruitcake?
Wimp, from the verb whimper, and influenced by the blimplike, mild-mannered cartoon character Wimpy, freeloader friend of Popeye the Sailor, means "a spineless, gutless, harmless person." It was taken to be an infuriating insult when hurled at President Bush the Elder more than a decade ago but has since lost much of its zip.
Fruitcake, however, is a double-edged sword. In its first sense of "crazy," it was thrust forcefully into the language by the gangster Jake "Greasy Thumb" Guzik in 1939, when his longtime mob boss, Alphonse Capone, was released from Alcatraz Penitentiary. Asked if the deranged Capone would reassume control of the Chicago mob, Guzik replied sadly, "Al is nuttier than a fruitcake."
The gangster's metaphor was not original. Nuts and nutty, originally meaning "crazy for," in the sense of "amorous about," had been in use in Britain since at least 1812. As it traveled to the US, the meaning narrowed to the plain "crazy," a mental stage beyond "eccentric." Then, Eugene O'Neill, in his 1914 play, The Movie Man, coined a memorable simile: "We sure are as nutty as a fruitcake or we wouldn't be here."
A second slang sense of fruitcake appeared in the 20th century, however: First fruit, and by 1960 fruitcake, meant "an effeminate male homosexual." It continues to have this meaning today, though the close association with nuttiness (by O'Neill via Guzik) gives fruitcake a primary slang meaning of "crazy; off his rocker." When used in a congressional colloquy, as we have just seen, the term's double sense heightens the offense.
Dead-ender
"He's a rather determined dead-ender type," said Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, speaking of the Taliban leader Mullah Omar in November 2001. "He just doesn't feel to me like the surrendering type." Asked a few months later if he meant that ousted Afghans would fight to the death, he replied, "We won't know that until they're dead."
The same term came in handy at the end of the major combat in Iraq. "Where pockets of dead-enders are trying to reconstitute," the Pentagon chief said, the Army was "rooting them out." But as American casualties continued through the summer, General John Abizaid, the Arabic-speaking new head of the US Central Command, said the attackers were part of a "classical guerrilla-type war situation." That suggested a continuance of low-level combat rather than the petering-out of resistance.
Dead End was the urban traffic sign in the 1930s that announced the finish of a thoroughfare. Sidney Kingsley made it the title of his 1935 play, symbolizing a hopeless future for a gang of teens, the young, tough actors who -- after the Samuel Goldwyn movie with Humphrey Bogart became a hit in 1937 -- were known as "the Dead End Kids."
The compound noun dead-ender appeared occasionally in the second half of the 20th century. The Associated Press did a feature in 1985 on a woman who manufactured buttons. "When I say `Buttons,'" she said, "it's a real dead-ender for conversations." The same sense of "conversation stopper" was apparent in a 1995 article by Jeff Lindenbaum in The Seattle Times: "'You shouldn't let your friends pressure you into having sex' is probably a dead-ender coming from Mom or Dad."
The novelist Bharati Mukherjee wrote in a 1995 New York Times book review of "the American as a mournful yuppie or a beer-drinking dead-ender." Then The Independent of London noted that "Neanderthal Man was not in fact a man but a chinless dead-ender who became extinct because he failed to intermarry with our human ancestors."
Sportswriters took to the synonym for "loser." In 1978, The Globe and Mail of Canada headlined an article "Good Bounce for Dead-Ender Tom McPhee"; McPhee came out of a deeply underprivileged ("Dead End Kid") background to win a basketball scholarship. Last month, Bill Conlin of Knight Ridder wrote of "dead-enders who will be released long before they make baseball's longest six-mile journey."
But the word is in the Army now. It is today's replacement for die-hard, taken from the nickname of Britain's Middlesex Regiment. Its colonel in 1811, wounded in the Battle of Albuera, refused to be taken to the rear, crying, "Die hard, 57th, die hard!" That was preceded in America by the report of George Washington's last words, which were "I die hard, but am not afraid to go."
Die-hard can have a connotation of nobly fighting in a lost cause, but dead-ender connotes foolhardy unwillingness to accept defeat.?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS