The world's top soil scientists met on the rich granite plains west of Brisbane, Australia, this week to over turn some long cherished farming practices.
They examined physical proof that the annual cycle of digging up soil to plant crops and spread fertilizer was robbing farmers of higher incomes and harming the environment.
Delegates to the special session of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization (ISTRO) saw alternative techniques that could cut man-made greenhouse emissions by as much as 5 per cent in as little as five years.
Jeff Tullberg professor of soil sciences at the University of Queensland, Australia, and president of ISTRO, described the changes as both simple yet dramatic in terms of methods and benefits.
"It has been held since time immemorial that breaking or tilling the soil was essential to let it `breathe' and make it more fertile," he says.
"But many soil scientists around the world have questioned that, and now all the data has come together to make the case to the contrary."
Tullberg says this excessive tilling means the soils `exhale' far more carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide than they would in a natural or non-farming cycle of growth and decay.
Both gases contribute significantly to the greenhouse effect which has been linked to global warming and the outbreak of wild weather across the planet.
While nitrous oxide is created naturally in swampy soils, its leakage from fields is multiplied by the breakdown of nitrogenous fertilizers and the engine emissions of large farm machines.
"Essentially, what we have done on our farms is to make our fields give up a surplus of greenhouse gases that would otherwise have remained locked in the ground," Tullberg said.
"We have also been able to prove that the excessive leakage of these gases renders the soil less fertile over time." he said.
According to the papers presented at the conference, the key to the soil fertility is worms, which are all too often wiped out by overuse of fertilizers and pesticides -- and by being dug up.
"Worms open up soils for water, air and nutrients. They make it store more water and they load the earth with carbon-rich organic material," Tullberg said.
"The concept that untilled soil will turn to rock-hard clay is only true if there are too few worms, and too much compacting of the soil by the wheels of heavy tractors and harvesters," he said.
"This has brought us to the second reason for the problem, excessive traffic over our crops," he says. "We have now demonstrated that, by reducing heavy traffic and minimizing digging, and spreading the right composts over the surface, we can lift the worm population up eightfold."
The soil scientists emphasized that the carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide concentrations in the atmosphere are continually created by natural and industrial processes and circulated in the atmosphere before being cycled back into the soils and oceans.
But in modern times these cycles have become unbalanced, creating rising concentrations of greenhouse gases last found in the atmosphere during the intense episode of global warming that preceded the onset of the last ice age, about 130,000 years ago.
Tullberg says the consensus on the proportion of man-made greenhouse gases from agriculture is about 25 percent of the total, with the rest emitted by cars, heavy industry, and the use of fire and machines to clear vast tracts of forest.
"If we can reduce leakage from farms by 20 percent, this translates to a comparatively easy reduction of 5 percent in global green house outputs," he said.
"We say it is easy because we don't have to invent any new technology. All we have to do is change the way we till the land, saving on fertilizer along the way," he said.
The world's largest tractor and harvester manufacturer, John Deere, stunned delegates midway through the conference when it announced a new range of equipment that would help cut the damage done by heavy vehicles to sensitive crop soils.
The company said it would produce tractor/harvester combinations where the wheels on both would track in perfect alignment, instead of one set of tracks falling inside the other.
The much smaller British tractor maker JCB started a similar program two years ago.
"This is an incredibly simple way of reducing degradation by compaction," Tullberg says. "The current type of machine inflicts some degree of damage to about 85 percent of the acreage planted with a crop like wheat."
"Accurate tracking and better management of the machines cuts this to only 15 percent of land under cultivation," he said.
The new machines are also designed to use the latest satellite navigation systems accurate to eight centimeters, allowing precision cultivation and harvesting in the worst weather.
Tullberg says: "The bottom line is that this costs very little, can be done very quickly, and leads to a lasting improvement in the richness of soils, with better crops from less fertilizer."
"I think this is by far the best fix anyone has come up with for a sizeable part of the global warming problem." he says.
"But I know other groups of scientists are also working on animal flatulence -- so, if they come up with a means for reducing the amount of methane coming out of cattle, we will be making better progress on climate change than we might have dared to hope for a few years ago," he says.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence