In the history of civilization, war could be said to top the list of mankind's cruelest and ugliest creations. In the past, the perpetrators of all the various atrocities men commit against one another in the course of fighting and warfare could only be condemned in writings. There was no way to impose real sanctions on them, and for this reason the world could only stand by helplessly and watch while ambition-ridden megalomaniacs repeatedly trampled on human rights.
After World War II, when the US took the lead in guiding post-war reconstruction of the world order, it perceived the fearsome and destructive nature of war. Thus, when plans were being laid for the UN, it was clearly stipulated in the UN Charter that any warlike actions not approved by the UN and undertaken for the sake of preserving peace are illegal. In the half century after World War II, however, the world still experienced many incidents of war, aggression and genocide because there existed no organization or judicial institution able to restrain the individuals responsible for these crimes or accept appeals from victims.
In July 1998, however, when the Rome Conference was convened, the situation changed completely. No longer was it impossible to go after those who commit war crimes or genocide. At the conference, the countries in attendance voted unanimously to pass a resolution (known as the "Rome Statute") establishing a permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) responsible for trying people accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression and so on. By July last year, this statute designed to protect human rights had already been signed and approved by over 60 countries. The ICC was formally established and ready to begin operations.
The ICC is a permanent, independent judicial institution under the guidance of the UN. Its establishment could be called a milestone in mankind's march toward realizing the rights to peace, security and the rule of law. Its function is to indict and punish those guilty of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. Moreover, its jurisdiction is not limited to affairs between countries.
The ICC has the right to investigate, indict and try anyone guilty of one of the four crimes listed above. The difference between the ICC and the International Court of Justice under the auspices of the UN is that the ICC is only responsible for investigating individual criminal culpability and it exercises jurisdiction only if the courts of any given country are unable to try a case on their own.
Furthermore, apart from countries applying to the court to open an investigation, the court's prosecutors may also carry out an investigation on their own initiative based on their knowledge of criminal activity. In addition, the court's jurisdiction is not limited to nations that are signatories of the Rome Statute. Even if the nation where criminal activity takes place or the accused has citizenship is not a signatory, the court can still exercise its powers. And it is precisely because it has these special characteristics that the ICC can act as a deterrent to individuals who would arbitrarily violate the human rights of others.
As a member of the international community, Taiwan has been relentlessly oppressed by China in international forums of all sorts and has been kicked out of numerous international organizations. Nevertheless, Taiwan still scrupulously abides by its responsibilities and duties as a member of the international community and does its utmost to respect and comply with many international treaties.
Taiwan has not disregarded international treaties just because it is not a signatory nation. While Taiwan continues to apply for membership in many international organizations, we should also note that becoming a signatory of the ICC represents a goal we can strive to attain. Since China, which has always had a poor human-rights record, has not yet signed and is even afraid to become a signatory nation of the ICC, it has no basis for trying to suppress Taiwan's application.
In the face of China's missile threat and other military threats, Taiwan must seek self-protection. Joining the signatories of the ICC would be a form of "alternative" self-defense. If China were to invade Taiwan, it would be engaging in criminal behavior prohibited by the ICC, and China's leaders would be considered war criminals and face investigation and indictment.
For this reason, China's schemes to attack Taiwan militarily could be deterred. Becoming a signatory of the ICC could help international society better understand Taiwan's commitment to human rights and at the same time provide real safeguards to our national security. Taiwan should actively campaign to be a part of the ICC and stand together with mainstream views around the world by striving to defend human rights.
Chien Hsi-chieh is the executive director of the Peacetime Foundation of Taiwan.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS