Since TVBS anchorwoman Kelly Hsueh (
Before TVBS announced it would suspend Hsueh, there was a joke going around that now would be the perfect time for the cable TV station to do some housecleaning. Wouldn't it be great, the joke continues, if other news anchors and broadcast journalists would launch a boycott -- demanding that only ethical and virtuous people should be hired to anchor newscasts. Would there be any TV anchors in Taiwan who could stand up to an integrity test? The punchline is that the only person likely to get fired as the result of such a housecleaning movement is the one who started it.
Unfortunately, the real joke is on the people of Taiwan. The quality of Taiwan's TV stations has degenerated to the point where every crow is equally black and everyone is equally lousy.
TVBS launched the sensational-reporting style that pervades Taiwan today. Ever since its began in 1993 with capital from Hong Kong media tycoon Run Run Shaw (
The station's 9pm discussion forum (2100,
The Taiwan Advertisers' Association (
The hysteria over the Kelly Hsueh story has prompted criticism from media watchdog organizations. In a way, however, such hype is a backlash against TVBS -- which is getting a dose of its own paparazzi medicine.
However, the print media should take some responsibility for the decline in the quality of TV news. If they had not reported on TV anchors and reporters as if they were celebrities, they probably would not have caused the TV stations to ignore their professionalism and plumb new lows in muckraking.
Self-policing and a stress on balanced reporting and coverage are the only way to salvage the reputation of Taiwan's media. The fact that TVBS has come under attack should teach journalists some valuable lessons and may even open the door to a media house-cleaning movement. The next time questions about a journalist's integrity come to light, the industry as a whole should take action to determine the validity of the complaint and require action be taken if the complaint is true. This is the only way to establish a basic work ethic and discipline and provide the people of Taiwan with reporting that they can trust.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS