Since TVBS anchorwoman Kelly Hsueh (
Before TVBS announced it would suspend Hsueh, there was a joke going around that now would be the perfect time for the cable TV station to do some housecleaning. Wouldn't it be great, the joke continues, if other news anchors and broadcast journalists would launch a boycott -- demanding that only ethical and virtuous people should be hired to anchor newscasts. Would there be any TV anchors in Taiwan who could stand up to an integrity test? The punchline is that the only person likely to get fired as the result of such a housecleaning movement is the one who started it.
Unfortunately, the real joke is on the people of Taiwan. The quality of Taiwan's TV stations has degenerated to the point where every crow is equally black and everyone is equally lousy.
TVBS launched the sensational-reporting style that pervades Taiwan today. Ever since its began in 1993 with capital from Hong Kong media tycoon Run Run Shaw (
The station's 9pm discussion forum (2100,
The Taiwan Advertisers' Association (
The hysteria over the Kelly Hsueh story has prompted criticism from media watchdog organizations. In a way, however, such hype is a backlash against TVBS -- which is getting a dose of its own paparazzi medicine.
However, the print media should take some responsibility for the decline in the quality of TV news. If they had not reported on TV anchors and reporters as if they were celebrities, they probably would not have caused the TV stations to ignore their professionalism and plumb new lows in muckraking.
Self-policing and a stress on balanced reporting and coverage are the only way to salvage the reputation of Taiwan's media. The fact that TVBS has come under attack should teach journalists some valuable lessons and may even open the door to a media house-cleaning movement. The next time questions about a journalist's integrity come to light, the industry as a whole should take action to determine the validity of the complaint and require action be taken if the complaint is true. This is the only way to establish a basic work ethic and discipline and provide the people of Taiwan with reporting that they can trust.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS