When Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) was first elected a legislator more than 20 years ago, he was certainly no stunning talent. New legislators who at the time received more attention than Wang included the KMT "Three Musketeers" -- Hsieh Shen-shan (謝深山) representing labor organizations, Tsai You-tu (蔡友土) representing farmers' organizations and Huang Tse-ching (黃澤青) representing fishermen's organizations -- as well as Hsiao Teng-tzang (蕭天讚) from Chiayi who later became Minister of Justice, and the independent Kang Ning-hsiang (康寧祥).
At the time, these five prestigious members were well-known and received a lot of media coverage. More senior legislators admired them and maintained good relations with them. Chiang Ching-kuo's (
Even though the "Three Musketeers" had not attained a high level of education, their political work was solid and they always had something substantial to say during interpellations.
After Kang was elected to the legislature, he was generally recognized as a most conscientious student. If he wasn't in the library immersed in books he was in the research room studying and searching for information. During the annual budget review, his copy of the budget was always full of scribbled notes. Even many of the old legislators holding political views different from Kang's admired the diligence and depth of his work.
Tsai's and Huang's political careers, however, were cut short after the system whereby legislators represented different professions was abolished. Hsiao, even though he was the first new legislator to become a member of the Cabinet, had to step down due to suspicions of involvement in a lobbying scandal. For the past few years, Hsiao has served as chairman of the Central News Agency. Hsieh served as Council of Labor Affairs chairman for a while, but after having been defeated in an election for Taipei County commissioner, he returned home to Hualien, dejected. Kang, who saw his star-status wane after being labelled part of the non-mainstream party faction, has had to watch the generation following the independents surpass him. Despite having done a good job in the Control Yuan, his appointment to the post of vice defense minister is still a step backward.
During the generational change in the legislature a few years back, Hsieh was seen as a prospective successor as legislative speaker. But because of Hsieh's education, Lee Teng-hui's (
While Kang and the "Three Musketeers" became stars thanks to their political work, Wang was busy with his own business and had no success worth mentioning on the legislative floor. When he, Tsai Chen-chou (蔡辰洲) and others formed the "Club of 13" it was obvious that his mind was elsewhere. But Wang is not a principled and opinionated politician. He has a soft personality and almost no political enemies. He has relied on social connections rather than professionalism. Handling his connections consistently over 20 years and eventually obtaining the unanimous support of each faction of each party, it is by pure skill that he has reached the position he holds today.
Let's turn our gaze to today's legislators. Afraid that they won't have enough time to bring their show to TV every day, there is no chance that they will have time to immerse themselves in books in the library looking for information. Not even one in a hundred will want to use these outdated methods of Kang and the "Three Musketeers." We will even be hard put to find someone like Wang, who step by step goes about expanding his network of contacts.
Parliamentary leaders in democratic countries are produced "naturally." This means that they, without any extra effort, will stand a chance of becoming speaker if their background experience is sufficient, their political performance is sufficiently professional or if they are sufficiently well connected. Liu and Wang relied on their experience and connections to win the speakership. Chiang Ping-kun (
Even though the DPP is the largest party in the legislature, both the speakership and the vice speakership slipped through its fingers -- this time -- and this is harmful to its status as the biggest party. The DPP should learn from the Wang story, and start working hard to gain experience, professionalism and connections, bringing forward its own Wang before the next three years are up. If not, the legislature will forever belong to someone else.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS