Tickets for the new public lottery went on sale yesterday, causing a rush on ticket outlets across the nation and revitalizing the "liu ho tsai" (
The lottery comes as the Cabinet plans for a new lottery for gambling on professional baseball and billiards. In addition, the Electronic Game Regulation Act, promoted by the electronic gaming industry, has incited a wave of bribe-taking among legislators. And then there is the recent attempt at passing the gambling clauses related to the establishment of casinos in the Offshore Islands Development Act.
With the lifting of the ban on gambling, Taiwan is becoming the Republic of Casino.
Even though gambling controlled by the government will likely win the public's trust, the revenue can be used for the public good and the changes will greatly limit underground gambling, the Taipei Times still believes that government-sponsored gambling is immoral. This new kind of tax, while bringing the dream of wealth to the poor, exploits the weakest in society and erodes social values. This is inappropriate.
Apart from the introduction of computerized gambling and preparations for the sports lottery, the pressure for legalized gambling and the increasing financial difficulties of the central and local governments will certainly lead to even more legalized gambling. Since lifting the ban on gambling seems unavoidable, all gambling should comply with the following principles:
1: Gambling activities must be 100 percent impartial and fair, without any external intervention. In sports gambling, for example, be it baseball or basketball, there will be more competition the more people gamble, which will be beneficial to the development of professional sports. However, the most fundamental premise for this kind of gambling is that the game on the field is not influenced by gamblers. If criminals infiltrate the competition, gamblers will lose all interest and the sport will be severely and adversely affected. Professional baseball in Taiwan is an excellent example of this.
2: The government should establish a special body responsible for maintaining high levels of public trust, strictly monitoring gambling behavior. No single government agency will be capable of encompassing the entire gambling process. Computerized gambling, for example, will, apart from the Ministry of Finance, also need the assistance of local governments to monitor gambling locations.
Police authorities will need to prevent the violation of gambling regulations and criminal influence on computer programming. With athletic competition as an example, the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports and other sports associations must assist in creating a system for healthy competition and monitoring organizations to guard against illegal manipulation of the competitive process.
3: The gambling surplus comes from society and must be returned to society. The surplus created by legal gambling must not become profits of any one individual or group. Each link in the gambling process involves a cost and any participant must receive a legal and reasonable reward. Apart from this, the surplus remaining after the payment of lottery prizes and other expenses has been deducted must be used for specific purposes related to the public good, or placed in the government treasury, or to develop sports. A strict auditing system must be put in place to audit the surplus and its use in order to avoid any irregularities.
Once the pandora's box of gambling has been opened, it will become a pie from which everyone will want a slice and it will tempt politicians from both ruling and opposition parties to become accomplices in a super-scandal. A comprehensive set of controls and regulations must therefore be laid down to avoid corruption on a scale large enough to create international headlines.
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which