Sometimes, in politics, it is better to leave some things unsaid. Once a stance or idea is clearly expressed in words, any room for further negotiation is limited and the path to possible alternatives might be blocked.
The head of the DPP's international affairs department, Tien Hsin (田欣), recently revealed in the US that "The DPP is willing to sacrifice part of Taiwan's sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace." Whether or not his remarks were taken out of context, Tien's intention was perhaps to "speak clearly and directly" (說清楚, 講明白) about President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) "integration" dictum (統合論). With such a clear interpretation of the integration dictum having been made, however, Taiwan might lose any room for cross-strait negotiation.
Whoever understands China's perspective of "sovereignty" knows that the Chinese authorities actually adopt a view of "absolute sovereignty"
The Western relative sovereignty, on the other hand, exists between nations for the purpose of co-operation. Although each participant needs to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in order to facilitate co-operation, it still keeps its status as a nation. Both the EU and the British Commonwealth, for example, have operated within such a structure of integration.
Today, the greater problem is that Beijing not only takes the national sovereignty issue as a symbol of its legitimacy, but also as a tool to promote anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, as well as a means to reach an internal consensus. As a result, if national sovereignty is divided into parts, the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) rule will lack legitimacy, and the Chinese people might even launch a revolution to end it.
So if Taiwan wishes to start talks with China on the issue of integration, first of all, the prerequisite for the talks is that China should admit that Taiwan is indeed a nation, and not Taiwan's willingness to sacrifice part of its sovereignty.
Next, China should change its ideology regarding anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, and stop viewing the US and European countries as if they were the Western empires of the 19th Century.
Of course, under the current circumstances, it is very difficult for Beijing to take the two steps outlined above. Consequently, if Taiwan proposes to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace, the island will fall into the "one China" trap, having used its trump card without securing peace. Thus, "the Buddha said: Don't tell!"
If we keep the "integration" dictum vague, the island might secure a better tomorrow.
Wang Kun-yi is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS