Sometimes, in politics, it is better to leave some things unsaid. Once a stance or idea is clearly expressed in words, any room for further negotiation is limited and the path to possible alternatives might be blocked.
The head of the DPP's international affairs department, Tien Hsin (田欣), recently revealed in the US that "The DPP is willing to sacrifice part of Taiwan's sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace." Whether or not his remarks were taken out of context, Tien's intention was perhaps to "speak clearly and directly" (說清楚, 講明白) about President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) "integration" dictum (統合論). With such a clear interpretation of the integration dictum having been made, however, Taiwan might lose any room for cross-strait negotiation.
Whoever understands China's perspective of "sovereignty" knows that the Chinese authorities actually adopt a view of "absolute sovereignty"
The Western relative sovereignty, on the other hand, exists between nations for the purpose of co-operation. Although each participant needs to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in order to facilitate co-operation, it still keeps its status as a nation. Both the EU and the British Commonwealth, for example, have operated within such a structure of integration.
Today, the greater problem is that Beijing not only takes the national sovereignty issue as a symbol of its legitimacy, but also as a tool to promote anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, as well as a means to reach an internal consensus. As a result, if national sovereignty is divided into parts, the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) rule will lack legitimacy, and the Chinese people might even launch a revolution to end it.
So if Taiwan wishes to start talks with China on the issue of integration, first of all, the prerequisite for the talks is that China should admit that Taiwan is indeed a nation, and not Taiwan's willingness to sacrifice part of its sovereignty.
Next, China should change its ideology regarding anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, and stop viewing the US and European countries as if they were the Western empires of the 19th Century.
Of course, under the current circumstances, it is very difficult for Beijing to take the two steps outlined above. Consequently, if Taiwan proposes to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace, the island will fall into the "one China" trap, having used its trump card without securing peace. Thus, "the Buddha said: Don't tell!"
If we keep the "integration" dictum vague, the island might secure a better tomorrow.
Wang Kun-yi is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS