Sometimes, in politics, it is better to leave some things unsaid. Once a stance or idea is clearly expressed in words, any room for further negotiation is limited and the path to possible alternatives might be blocked.
The head of the DPP's international affairs department, Tien Hsin (田欣), recently revealed in the US that "The DPP is willing to sacrifice part of Taiwan's sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace." Whether or not his remarks were taken out of context, Tien's intention was perhaps to "speak clearly and directly" (說清楚, 講明白) about President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) "integration" dictum (統合論). With such a clear interpretation of the integration dictum having been made, however, Taiwan might lose any room for cross-strait negotiation.
Whoever understands China's perspective of "sovereignty" knows that the Chinese authorities actually adopt a view of "absolute sovereignty"
The Western relative sovereignty, on the other hand, exists between nations for the purpose of co-operation. Although each participant needs to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in order to facilitate co-operation, it still keeps its status as a nation. Both the EU and the British Commonwealth, for example, have operated within such a structure of integration.
Today, the greater problem is that Beijing not only takes the national sovereignty issue as a symbol of its legitimacy, but also as a tool to promote anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, as well as a means to reach an internal consensus. As a result, if national sovereignty is divided into parts, the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) rule will lack legitimacy, and the Chinese people might even launch a revolution to end it.
So if Taiwan wishes to start talks with China on the issue of integration, first of all, the prerequisite for the talks is that China should admit that Taiwan is indeed a nation, and not Taiwan's willingness to sacrifice part of its sovereignty.
Next, China should change its ideology regarding anti-colonialism and anti-hegemonism, and stop viewing the US and European countries as if they were the Western empires of the 19th Century.
Of course, under the current circumstances, it is very difficult for Beijing to take the two steps outlined above. Consequently, if Taiwan proposes to sacrifice part of its sovereignty in exchange for cross-strait peace, the island will fall into the "one China" trap, having used its trump card without securing peace. Thus, "the Buddha said: Don't tell!"
If we keep the "integration" dictum vague, the island might secure a better tomorrow.
Wang Kun-yi is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS