The new Justice Minister Chen Ding-nan (陳定南), who has been given the responsibility of getting rid of "black-gold" politics, has run into a war of words with Wang Kuang-ru (王光宇), head of the ministry's Investigation Bureau (MJIB). Even though Premier Tang Fei (唐飛) came out to ease the "disharmony between ministries and bureaus," the two were still unwilling to shake hands in front of legislators and the media. The standoff has cast a pall over the prospects of the new government's crackdown on crime.
The justice ministry is one of the Investigation Bureau's supervisors, but not its real boss. Much of the MJIB's work is supervised by the National Security Bureau (NSB), while the portion of work that is key to the ministry -- cracking down on corruption, drugs and economic crimes -- is done by makeshift groups. Even though the MJIB's budget is listed under the justice ministry, the NSB has an even larger secret budget for it. In terms of money and power, the NSB looks more like the bureau's boss than the ministry.
In the past, poking their noses in the MJIB's affairs had caused the downfall of justice ministers -- the bureau's administrative superiors. Remember Hsiao Teng-tzang
Chen is a stubborn, idiosyncratic politician. As long as he believes he is in the right, he moves ahead without worrying about hurting other's feelings. That is one reason he has such strong public support for his crackdown on crime.
But now Chen seems to have stepped into the frying pan. Shaking up the investigative mechanism, fussing over the difficulties of directing the MJIB, tightening up the management of detention centers, all mean Chen has kept the people in the various agencies under him biting their nails. Their reluctance to support the new minister's policies have made Chen very much the Lone Ranger in the ministry. He only has public opinion and support to fall back on.
Sensing the hostility of Taiwan's intelligence agencies to him, Chen Shui-bian
We hope the latter will not turn out to be true. Chen Shui-bian, like many other Taiwanese, suffered under the "White Terror" inflicted by intelligence agencies. When he was a legislator, Chen had many proposals about ways to reform Taiwan's intelligence system. Now that he is in power, he should formulate a policy for these units that is different from his predecessors.
The problem with the MJIB lies not in its status, but in its ill-defined responsibilities and powers. Separating intelligence and law-enforcement work -- putting political surveillance personnel under the National Security Bureau and turning the MJIB into a specialized anti-crime agency -- will be the beginning of a more rational system.
The MJIB has operated in a highly centralized chain of command. All investigators have to seek approval of their every step from headquarters. Accusations that prosecutors have had difficulties directing MJIB personnel or that the bureau has "killed" cases are no surprise.
Putting the MJIB's crime-fighting units under prosecutors will simplify the command system. This is not only compatible with the spirit of the rule of law, but is also a prerequisite for making the MJIB more efficient.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS