The Asian Baseball Championship and qualifying tournament for the 2000 Sydney Olympics is finally over, and the Chinese Taipei team came home with only a bronze medal, to the great dismay of its fans. But the fans at home, despite their disappointment at Chinese Taipei's showing, did not criticize the hard work of the coaches or the players.
Why did the team only place third in the tournament? Why is it that professional leagues in other countries raise the standards of their national baseball teams, while our professional leagues in Taiwan have failed to improve the quality of the Chinese Taipei team?
Why is it that Taiwan -- which like other countries has produced players with enough talent to take on the US major league -- is still incapable of capturing the championship? The heads of Taiwan's two baseball leagues and the commission that oversees them are primarily responsible for this state of affairs.
Taiwan has produced lots of talented players in the past, including Tu Hong-ching (
All of them could be favorably compared to Daisuke Matsuzaka (
In terms of coaches, look at Lin Hua-wei's performance in the Asia Cup. His carefully planned strategy enabled him to tie games with South Korea and Japan, even without a lot of talented players. His performance put looks of consternation on the faces of the coaches of other teams, making them take back arrogant and belittling comments they had made before the tournament began. The solidarity that the coaches for the Taiwan team exhibited was effective.
There is no doubt that fans from Taiwan are the most endearing and passionate in the world.
While baseball league conflicts have distracted fans to some degree, cable TV ratings for the series still shot up to the No. 1 spot. Fans showed their support on the Internet as well. Fans are the greatest asset to the development of Taiwan's professional leagues.
Okay, we've established that Taiwan has great players, coaches and fans. So what's the problem?
The answer: league officials and team owners. Teams regard players as their exclusive property, as long as they perform as expected. But as soon as problems arise, owners dump players, break off all ties with them and even try to smear their reputations.
While it's true that players should assume responsibility for their involvement in betting scandals, the leagues should not completely escape censure. Why should players shoulder all the blame? In some cases, they are slapped with lifetime bans against playing the sport again.
And while it is true that up-and-coming players in Taiwan play for foreign teams because they pay better, teams here can still provide them with an environment in which they can continue to improve their skills
The Asia Cup has become the center of attention for Taiwan's baseball fans, and baseball is the leading candidate for Taiwan's national sport.
If team owners can one day forgo their individual interests and change their narrow-minded thinking, it may be possible to bring together all the top players past and present and form one team.
Baseball leagues could be reorganized, giving each player a chance to play, while retaining the talented players and getting rid of the dead wood.
The gifted athletes that Taiwan produces each year, along with professional coaching staff and enthusiastic fan support, should be enough to really get baseball moving in Taiwan.
It shouldn't be too long before Taiwan's baseball team makes the South Korean and Japanese teams bow with respect and good sportsmanship.
Tai Hsi-chin is a legislative assistant.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily