When US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld addressed the Shangri-la Security Dialogue in Singapore earlier this month, most of the attention in the meeting and later in the press focused on his candid comments about China's military strategy, spending, and modernization.
The secretary barely touched on the fundamental revision in the US defense posture that is intended to counter a potential threat from China or to respond swiftly to contingencies elsewhere, pointing only to "a repositioning of US forces worldwide that will significantly increase our capabilities in support of our friends and allies in this region."
US defense officials in Washington, at the Pacific Command here in Hawaii, and in Asia have spent many months seeking to bring Rumsfeld's policy to reality. They have fashioned a plan intended to strengthen the operational control of the Pacific Command, enhance forces in the US territory of Guam, tighten the alliance with Japan and streamline the US stance in South Korea.
As pieced together from US and Japanese officials, who cautioned that no firm decisions have been made, the realignment shapes up like this:
The US Army headquarters in Hawaii will become a war-fighting command to devise and execute operations rather than to train and provide troops to other commands as it does now. The US four-star general's post in South Korea will be transferred to Hawaii.
I Corps at Fort Lewis, Washington, will move to Camp Zama, Japan, to forge ties with Japan's ground force. Japan will organize a similar unit, perhaps called the Central Readiness Command, to prepare and conduct operations with the US Army.
Japanese officials are considering elevating the Self-Defense Agency to a ministry and renaming the Ground Self-Defense Force as the Japanese Army and the same for the navy and air force. Shedding those postwar names would reflect Japan's emergence from its pacifist cocoon.
In South Korea, the US plans to disband the Eighth Army that has been there since the Korean War of 1950 to 1953, to relinquish command of Korean troops to the South Koreans, and to minimize or eliminate the UN Command set up during the Korean War.
A smaller tactical command will oversee US forces that remain in the South, which will be down to 25,000 from 37,000 in 2008.
That may be cut further since Seoul has denied the US the "strategic flexibility" to dispatch US forces from South Korea to contingencies elsewhere.
The Marines, who have a war-fighting center in Hawaii, will move the headquarters of the III Marine Expeditionary Force (III MEF) to Guam from Okinawa to reduce the friction caused by the US "footprint" on that Japanese island. How many Marines would move was not clear but combat battalions will continue to rotate to Okinawa from the US.
Some US officers are displeased because local politics rather than military necessity dictated the move. They asserted that the Tokyo government, despite its desire to "reduce the burden" on Okinawans, has blocked US attempts to move forces to other bases in Japan.
Other officers saw an advantage to having III MEF in Guam. If a Japanese government sought to restrict the movement of US forces, III MEF would be able to operate without reference to Tokyo.
The 13th Air Force moved to Hawaii from Guam in May to give that service a war-fighting headquarters like those of the other services. General Paul Hester, commander of the Pacific Air Forces, was quoted in press reports: "We're building an air operations center and war-fighting headquarters that serves the entire Pacific region."
The Air Force plans to establish a strike force on Guam that will include six bombers and 48 fighters rotating there from US bases. In addition, 12 refueling aircraft, which are essential to long-range projection of air power, will be stationed at Andersen Air Force Base there.
Further, three Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance aircraft will be based on Guam. Global Hawks can range 19,312km, at altitudes up to 19,312m, for 35 hours, which means they can cover Asia from Bangkok to Beijing with sensors making images of 103,599.5km2 a day.
In Japan, the Air Force is willing to share Yokota Air Force Base, west of Tokyo, with Japan's Air Self-Defense Force but has resisted opening the base to civilian aircraft, citing security concerns. Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara has demanded such rights.
The Kitty Hawk, the conventionally-powered aircraft carrier based at Yokosuka, Japan, is slated to be replaced by 2008.
The US wants to station a nuclear-powered carrier there while some Japanese politicians want the last of the conventionally-powered carriers, John F. Kennedy, to be chosen.
The Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor, whose war-fighting element is Joint Task Force 519, has moved three attack submarines to Guam to put them closer to the Western Pacific and will probably be assigned an additional carrier from the Atlantic fleet to be based at Pearl Harbor.
All in all, these changes will take upwards of three years to complete during which time Beijing can be expected to object in no uncertain terms.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS