The scene in the glittering ballroom of the Istana Hotel in central Kuala Lumpur was unusual, to say the least.
Hundreds of political activists from Malaysia's People's Justice Party, Keadilan, were joined by businessmen, diplomats and journalists to discuss political reform in Southeast Asia. They dined on curried mutton and chicken and, Malaysia being an Islamic country, drank orange juice and coffee.
But when the guests settled back to listen to the after-dinner speeches, the extraordinary nature of the occasion became apparent.
ILLUSTRATION: YUSHA
This wasn't a government function and no Malaysian ministers were invited.
It was, to put it bluntly, a lavish exercise in political subversion, for Keadilan is an opposition party led by the black sheep of Malaysian politics, Anwar Ibrahim, and his wife, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.
Anwar has become a non-person, officially speaking, since he was ousted as deputy prime minister in 1998 and jailed by the government of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad.
His party had to obtain a permit even to hold the banquet at all -- not always easy, since permission is often withheld and many hotel managements are reluctant to be associated with "troublemakers."
There were nervous jokes about keeping a watch on the door in case the Police Special Branch burst in and arrested everyone under the detested Internal Security Act.
And when the speeches began, it became evident that the real target of the discussion on reform was not Myanmar or some other regional regime but Malaysia itself.
One party, the United Malays National Organization, has dominated Malaysian politics since independence from Britain in 1957 and is used to having its own way, winning a virtual landslide victory last year that Keadilan and other opponents say were manipulated.
But as events across the world continue to show, virtual one-party states, pseudo-democracies and self-perpetuating ruling elites are going out of fashion.
Many Malaysians would say such descriptions do not apply to them. And perhaps it was a coincidence that Ukraine's ambassador attended the dinner. But perhaps not.
The people of Ukraine, along with those of Georgia, Serbia, Lebanon, Kyrgyzstan and Indonesia, have all recently opted for a new brand of genuinely pluralist politics.
Anwar's purpose in holding the banquet seemed to be to suggest that the time for a similar change in Malaysia was fast approaching, too.
The guest speakers certainly thought so. Datuk Yeop Adlan Bin Che Rose, a former Malaysian ambassador, denounced "political gangsterism" in Malaysia "legitimized by the use and abuse of the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy." He decried "endemic corruption and cronyism at the highest levels of government," ridiculing official pledges to mount a crackdown on graft.
"You can pour any amount of perfume on dung," he said. "But when the alcohol evaporates, what you are left with is still shit."
Progressive Thai Senator Kraisak Choonhavan said that his own country had suffered years of violent military dictatorship before establishing constitutional civilian government. Malaysians such as Anwar had been fortunate in one sense, he said.
"In Thailand they don't lock you up. They just shoot you," he said.
Amien Rais, the former speaker of the Indonesian parliament who helped lead the 1998 pro-democracy revolution that toppled General Suharto, spelled out the steps required if lasting, meaningful reform were to be achieved. Constitutional protections for human rights, freedom of religion and the press, clean governance and the pre-eminence of the rule of law were essential building blocks in the construction of a truly democratic state, he said.
"Under Suharto our republic was transformed into some sort of kingdom," Rais said. "He was suffering from Louis XIV syndrome -- `l'etat, c'est moi.'"
Things were not so bad in Malaysia, he conceded. But he warned that a reformed Indonesia, for all its remaining imperfections, was leaving its neighbor behind.
Anwar's concluding speech was listened to in rapt silence. He said the movement for reformasi in Malaysia could not be constrained for much longer. Unemployment was rising, the economy was sinking under the weight of incompetence and corruption and foreign investors were taking flight. Attacking his nemesis, Mahathir, he said the official gagging and self-censorship of Malaysia's media were reminiscent of "Nazi Germany's propaganda machine."
After recuperating abroad from his six-year jail ordeal, he said he would come home to Malaysia at the end of the year.
"I am committed to change and will continue to work with all progressive forces in Malaysia to pursue the reform agenda," he pledged.
Anwar's permanent return next year could presage significant upheavals in Malaysia, especially if an economic downturn exacerbates political discontent. But that may be still in the future. What was startling about the "Evening with Anwar" at the Istana Hotel in downtown Kuala Lumpur was the powerful strength of feeling, freely expressed, against a continuation of the status quo.
"We are wallowing in our own muck," protested Datuk Yeop Adlan Bin Che Rose.
It was time, he suggested, for all Malaysians to stand up and brush themselves down.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS