North Korea may be a rogue state, part of the "axis of evil," an outpost of tyranny and all the other things that US President George W. Bush says it is. But there is no denying that the isolated regime of self-styled Dear Leader, Kim Jong-il, has an impeccable sense of timing.
Just before the 188-country conference charged with reviewing the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) gathered in New York this month, Pyongyang shut down its main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon. Since then it says it has removed 8,000 spent fuel rods and extracted sufficient plutonium to "bolster our nuclear arsenal."
Coming on top of North Korea's formal announcement in February that it had acquired nuclear weapons and its earlier withdrawal from the NPT, this latest shock seemed to confirm what every government knows but is reluctant to say in public.
A wide array of international safeguards, diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, ill-disguised threats and a decade of on-off negotiations have failed to prevent egregious, highly dangerous acts of proliferation by one of the world's most unstable failed states.
Any remaining uncertainty over whether North Korea really has the bomb could be banished soon. According to US intelligence, Pyongyang may be about to conduct an underground nuclear test. As with the Indian and Pakistani tests in 1998, such an event would radically and permanently alter geostrategic and military calculations. For East Asia, it would be a whole new ball game.
The bad news for the NPT conferees in New York did not stop there. Even as they argued over an agenda, Iran was threatening to walk away from talks with the EU over its nuclear programs and ditch the treaty.
"If Iran cannot use its legitimate rights in the framework of the NPT, it will no longer have respect for the treaty," Iran's chief negotiator, Hassan Rohani, said in Moscow. In other words, if the EU, backed by the US, continued to insist on a permanent freeze of all Iran's uranium enrichment activities -- which Tehran says are for purely peaceful, civil purposes -- then Iran, like North Korea, would go its own way.
Iran's sense of timing also takes a lot of beating. Tehran is well aware that a major bone of contention at the NPT conference is the demand by non-nuclear weapons states that the five declared nuclear powers -- the US, Britain, France, Russia and China -- honor their own disarmament obligations.
Under the "13 Steps" agreed at the last NPT review meeting in 2000, the so-called "big five" agreed to make "further efforts to reduce their nuclear arsenals unilaterally." They also pledged "a diminishing role for nuclear weapons in security policies ... and to facilitate the process of their total elimination."
Iran and other countries point out, with justice, that these obligations have been largely ignored. The US is modernizing its nuclear arsenal, not moving to scrap it. It is also conducting research into new battlefield nuclear devices.
France holds proudly to its "force de frappe," a symbol of its otherwise shrinking national potency. The UK meanwhile is examining replacements for its submarine-based Trident nuclear weapons system and may buy "off the shelf" from the US in breach of NPT rules.
Concurrently, President Vladimir Putin is boasting of new world-beating Russian long-range missiles, with China showing even less interest in disarmament.
Meanwhile, the NPT's Article IV does in fact stress that signatory nations have the "inalienable right to develop ... nuclear energy for peaceful purposes" and to acquire technology to this end.
That, says Iran, is exactly what it is doing, and US distrust of its intentions is no good reason to desist.
All in all, the uncomfortable bottom line is that, far from being reinforced as was promised in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, international non-proliferation efforts are in deep trouble.
India, Israel and Pakistan, which never joined the NPT, have effectively got away with their bomb-making. Now, if North Korea is proved to have nuclear capability and if Iran, despite its denials, follows suit, countries ranging from Japan and South Korea to Egypt and Saudi Arabia may feel obliged to follow suit.
In other words, the successes of the NPT, for all its considerable faults, may be overwhelmed by a new nuclear arms race.
All the more reason, therefore, to heed the word of the former US president, Jimmy Carter. As a matter of urgency, he said this month, all nuclear-armed states should renounce first use of their weapons.
The US should abandon its "Star Wars" ballistic missile defense project and ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Russia should do more to secure and reduce its vulnerable stockpiles. And Middle Eastern countries should act together to remove nuclear weapons from their region.
"If the US and other nuclear powers are serious about stopping the erosion of the NPT, they must act now on these issues," Carter warned. The relative indifference of the major powers to the gathering threat, he said, was little short of appalling.
Carter's timing was impeccable, too.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS