As Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) sat down, pundits were questioning who needs who more? Does the aging Lien, who has never won a real election, need Hu to salvage his image and even keep in the game? Does Hu need Lien for public relations and to put pressure on President Chen Shui-bian(陳水扁)?
The real question, however, is at a deeper level. Does Taiwan need China or does China need Taiwan? My view? China needs Taiwan, hands down.
Let's forget about the fact that the People's Republic of China (PRC) needs Taiwan so its submarines and navy can have immediate blue water access.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs Taiwan to dominate travel between the East and South China Seas and so isolate Japan and the Koreas from their other Asian neighbors.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs the cash cow Taiwan, with its millions of Taiwanese investment dollars and businesses to help fuel its growing economy.
Let's forget about the fact that China needs Taiwan because foreign companies don't trust China's rule of law and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, and so use Taiwan as a safe place for their R&D investments and access to China markets. Let's forget these many pragmatic reasons. The PRC needs Taiwan because of the "D" word.
Yes, the "D" word, democracy. Democracy is not antithetical to those of Chinese heritage. China needs Taiwan to show that democracy can and does work. It needs Taiwan to see that its people can be trusted with the right to vote.
Chinese can live by rule of law.
Chinese don't have to be treated like children, to be "protected" from themselves by a privileged hierarchical elite.
Chinese don't need their religion and beliefs controlled. The Falun Gong have never posed a threat to Taiwan's rule of law.
Chinese don't need their press muzzled. A free press and access to information and differing points of view have made Taiwan vibrant, not destructive.
Chinese don't need to be imprisoned if they question or challenge the government and its judgment. Taiwan's many vocal dissident minorities freely stroll the streets.
Contrary to PRC propaganda, chaos is not the result of the above freedoms.
Taiwan has shown that free people with free elections and a free press can live harmoniously under the rule of law even in little matters. When Taiwan imposed a motorcycle helmet law, many foreigners said, "It won't work, Chinese think the law is for other people." But it worked.
When Taipei imposed a strict separation of garbage and trash, foreigners said, "Chinese won't go into such detail for the environment." But they did.
Believe it or not, Taiwanese have and continue to show the way for those of Chinese heritage.
So maybe then, after more than a half a century since the People's Liberation Army "liberated" those in China, it's time to start trusting the people.
Does China need Taiwan? You bet.
China needs Taiwan to understand its own people and culture.
Jerome Keating has lived in Taiwan for 16 years and is co-author of Island in the Stream, A Quick Case Study of Taiwan's Complex History.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS