Whether Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
It should be analyzed on various points.
In regard to cross-strait relations, the visits by Lien and People First Party Chairman James Soong (
They have eased the tension between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
In fact, the Chinese Communist Party has actively pushed for the visits of the opposition leaders in order to ease cross-strait tension and soothe the global resentment that has emerged against the "Anti-Secession" Law.
But this cannot build a foundation for cross-strait peace.
Regarding Taiwan's domestic affairs, the visits by Lien and Soong have once again stirred up conflict between pro-unification and pro-independence camp ideologies.
After the legislative elections in December, the government tried to create an atmosphere of reconciliation, while the new Cabinet promoted reconciliation and coexistence.
There were also high expectations that social conflict in Taiwan could be reduced. But people were stunned by the violence at CKS International Airport on Tuesday last week.
As an outsider, the first question that came to my mind was how Taiwanese people could talk so much about reconciliation with the other side of the Strait when they continue to fight so severely among themselves.
The violence at the airport told us another very painful fact: Domestic integration of Taiwan is yet to be completed.
In light of the extremely different stances that exist on this nation's development, adjustments are necessary and consensus and reconciliation should be sought.
A society can only look outwards when its internal problems are resolved.
Under such circumstances, I believe that politicians who truly love Taiwan should put aside their ideological interests and focus instead on their community.
They should also do their best to make more decisions that benefit ethnic reconciliation and social harmony.
Real cross-strait talks can only take place someday when a consensus is reached within Taiwan.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations in Beijing.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS