These days, you can tell a true Taiwan sophisticate by whether or not they have received an invitation from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to visit China.
Everyone is excited about the fact that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
For instance, when I am invited to Beijing to have a tete-a-tete with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), I can be relied upon to sign a "10-point agreement" that will absolutely be to the advantage of the people of Taiwan.
Apparently, Lien and Soong have received personal invitations from the CCP to travel to Beijing and meet with Hu. Although I have not yet received such an invitation, it is clear that this is merely an administrative oversight by our good friends in Zhongnanhai, and that my invitation will be forthcoming shortly.
Now, understandably, I am not nearly as influential as either of the two opposition leaders. However, I would like to point out that regardless of the importance of the agreements that Lien or Soong may sign in China, these two individuals can hardly compete with me in terms of the concessions they are willing to make in the interest of cross-strait peace.
Should I be called upon -- or rather, when I am called upon -- to sign an agreement with Beijing, I would like to state categorically that I will defend and promote the interests of Taiwan at every opportunity.
For example, when I meet with Hu -- or "JT-Baby," as I like to call him -- I will guarantee that:
First, it will be illegal for certain individuals to talk about Taiwan's independence. Specifically, all taxi drivers shall be required to stop talking about independence. In fact, I shall make it mandatory for taxi drivers to stop talking about politics altogether.
Let me go further. As a demonstration of Taiwan's goodwill, it will be illegal for taxi drivers to speak entirely, except to acknowledge direct questions about their passengers' destination.
Second, I am willing to concede to the authorities in Beijing the right to use "non-peaceful means" against any individual or group who disobeys traffic laws in Taiwan. Especially taxi drivers. This can include the employment of the Second Artillery Corps' missiles to enforce the agreement, if necessary.
Third, to protect the interests of Taiwanese businesspeople with investments in China, I will guarantee a healthy tax exemption to all businesspeople who contribute to a special "Cross-Strait Peace Promotion Fund" which, for the sake of administrative clarity, will be established in my name. Thirty percent of all funds remitted to this account will be given to the appropriate CCP officials to ensure smooth sailing for Taiwanese businesspeople.
Fourth, a special cross-strait exchange foundation will be established which will allow single, attractive 18-to-30-year-olds to travel from Taiwan to China or vice versa for one-on-one negotiations with a select group of individuals, to be determined by the signatories of this agreement.
Fifth, Chinese officials will no longer refer to their Taiwanese counterparts as "Taiwan splittists" or "Taiwan authorities," but rather as "Taiwan's leaders" or "Taiwan's leadership." To reciprocate this change, Taiwanese will no longer refer to their counterparts as "Communist bandits" or "bloodsucking authoritarian bastards."
Sixth, direct cross-strait cargo flights shall be allowed without restriction, so long as each carrier contributes NT$3 million to the aforementioned "Cross-Strait Peace Promotion" Fund.
Seventh, direct cross-strait passenger flights shall be allowed in the interests of serving Article 4 of this declaration.
Eighth, Taiwanese companies shall be permitted to build as many factories and make as many investments in China as they see fit, so long as 100 percent of their profits shall be remitted to Taiwan. Chinese companies shall also be permitted to remit 100 percent of their profits to Taiwan.
Ninth, all Chinese officials shall be allowed to travel to Taiwan at will, so long as their criminal history is deemed satisfactory by law enforcement authorities. To reciprocate, all Taiwanese officials may travel to China at their will, so long as their psychological histories are deemed satisfactory by mental health authorities.
Tenth, in keeping with its moves towards establishing a free-market economy, China shall abolish its "one China" principle and adopt a "one market" principle. For its part, Taiwan will throw aside former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Clearly, non-official diplomacy has its utility, and the people of Taiwan deserve a chance to let their voice be heard. Therefore, let the government cast aside its reservations and open its arms to the opportunity it now has before it. Let me sign a 10-point agreement.
Mac William Bishop is a journalist based in Taipei. Comments may be directed to mwbtaiwan@hotmail.com.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for