So Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), long an admired official of the Republic of China government, who played an admirable role in Taiwan's democratization, but who very narrowly lost the last presidential election, now plans to visit Beijing. There he will evidently find plenty of time for amiable discussions with the unelected leader of one of the world's last communist dictatorships.
In preparation for this trip, moreover, Lien has found time for a secret visit to Singapore where he found time for consultation with its autocratic rulers. But Lien has been unable to find time for what is really needed: namely, a face-to-face discussion with the elected president and government of his own country, the Republic of China, and wide discussion among the people of Taiwan, to ensure that at this critical juncture politics really do end at the water's edge, and Taiwan speaks with a single voice. Few things are more important to the nation's future than a certain basic domestic consensus.
By making this trip, Lien also jeopardizes the political future of a whole younger generation of highly talented KMT politicians, poised to take the reins of government once again, probably sooner rather than later. Now they will be tarred by this ill-judged venture.
But above all, Lien puts at risk his own historical reputation. For even though Beijing is promising Lien a welcome with protocol normally reserved for heads of state, neither Lien nor anyone else should have the slightest doubt as to how Chinese communist leadership in fact sees his mission: Zheng Chenggong's (鄭成功) grandson, long expected in Beijing, has finally arrived.
That grandson, Zheng Keshuang (鄭克塽), is remembered as the man who abandoned the Ming cause and turned Taiwan over to the Qing in 1683 in return for the empty title and honors of "Duke."
If Lien cannot find the wisdom to call off this ill-judged venture, let us hope at least that he will consult broadly in Taiwan before he leaves, not least with its elected government, and that in China he will have the courage to speak truth to power, robustly defending the rights of the people of Taiwan and the great democratic tradition of Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) , of which his party is the custodian. Otherwise, I fear Lien will end in humiliation what has been a long and distinguished career.
Arthur Waldron
Professor of international relations, University of Pennsylvania
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS