Though its churches are well-financed and have millions of registered members, Germany, the homeland of Pope Benedict XVI, is only barely Christian in the eyes of church leaders.
The Catholic Church and the various Protestant denominations are deeply worried at their long decline.
A year ago, Germany marked the 1,250th anniversary of the death of Saint Boniface, the Benedictine monk and bishop who converted the Germans in the 8th century. Cardinal Karl Lehmann observed that today's Germans were reverting to heathens.
Lehmann, the chairman of the German Catholic Bishops' Conference, said Christian faith was drying up, with many of his countrymen knowing nothing of Christian beliefs or customs.
Protestants have said the same. Bishop Wolfgang Huber, who chairs the council of Lutheran and Reformed churches, has appealed for new fire to be breathed into the embers of the old faith.
Protestant groups are planning advertising campaigns in the east of the country, where most people are non-Christian after 40 years of communist rule and atheism in schools.
In a German population of 82 million, only about 52 million are registered members of the main Christian churches. About half of that number are Catholics, who are concentrated in the south, while the north tends to be Protestant. The fierce rivalry between the two has eased in the decades since World War II.
Immigration has added new religions to the mix. Some 3 percent of the population is Muslim, with the National Council of Muslims stressing that Islam is now Germany's second-biggest faith.
Since the beginning of the 1990s, 3 million people have renounced their church membership, a move required if they want to stop paying dues.
Polls show that large numbers of those who remain are often ignorant about central matters of faith or disagree with church teaching.
Many registered members only attend church once or twice a year, mainly at Christmas, and only seek the services of their church for baptisms, weddings, funerals or at times of crisis.
Compared to other countries, the Catholic and Protestant churches in Germany are affluent.
They have been financed since 1875 by a 9 percent surcharge on income taxes collected by the state and passed on to the churches. The Catholic Church receives about 4 billion euros (US$5 billion) annually and the Lutherans about the same. The churches also receive state subsidies for their social welfare work, meaning they operate huge budgets.
Separately, donations fund Catholic relief groups that include Misereor, for the developing world, and Renovabis, for eastern Europe. The Catholic organization Caritas relieves hardship within Germany, and offers disaster relief abroad.
The Protestants have equivalent relief groups.
Church budgets have been declining, both because of general reductions in income tax and resignations from the churches. The result has been cost-cutting and even staff lay-offs.
Added to that has been a range of internal problems including a shortage of priests among the Catholics. Nationally, annual first-year seminary enrollments have hovered at about 200 for several years. That is far too few to replace priests reaching retirement age.
In many places, priests have been hired from Poland, Africa and Asia to say mass.
It is possible for men and women to study Catholic theology at universities, but graduates are only allowed to do a fraction of what ordained priests may do.
Reform groups argue that allowing priests to marry would attract more men into the
profession.
However the German bishops cannot change celibacy rules in Germany alone.
Cardinal Lehmann and his Lutheran counterpart Huber, who have joined pro-life initiatives, have nevertheless found that the views of the Church still have great weight in Germany.
Both Catholics and Lutherans often offer faith-based comment on political issues, and sometimes even come into conflict with the Christian Democratic parties founded after World War II, which combine center-right policies with Christian-based attitudes.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.