Over the past two weeks, anti-Japanese demonstrations have expanded from Beijing to Shanghai, Guangdong and other cities across China. The targets have also expanded from the Japanese embassy to businesses and expatriates. This is the most severe crisis in Sino-Japanese relations since the two countries established diplomatic ties in 1972.
Although Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (
The demonstrations indicate heightened Chinese nationalism. China suffered almost a century of bullying and humiliation at the hands of other nations, and has been through over 60 years of communist upheaval. Now, with its rapid military and economic growth, China seems like an impetuous young man who has yet to learn to control his temper and his strength.
But Tokyo's whitewashing of its wartime atrocities is the fuse that set off an explosion of Chinese nationalism. The protesters who have taken to the streets over the last two weeks are young Chinese, too young to have lived through World War II. Their hatred of the Japanese is a product of media manipulation and indoctrination -- aided by the Internet and other high-tech media.
The Chinese government does not usually allow people to voice their opinions and has clamped down on large-scale demonstrations such as the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 and the Falun Gong movement. Although Beijing has mobilized police to maintain public order, popular sentiment has run so high that even the limited police presence has had little effect. This is why Tokyo believes that Beijing may have given tacit approval for the protests.
Although the Chinese government may be using the demonstrations as a vent for popular discontent, it must stop them from getting out of control. In 2003, there was a total of 58,000 protests in China, an average of 160 a day. The scale of the protests and the frequency with which the government has been their target have also increased. China is under enormous internal pressure on issues ranging from corruption and ethnic conflicts to disparity of economic development and social injustice. Any single protest could spiral out of control and become a national movement that Beijing cannot contain.
If the anti-Japanese riots continue, will Beijing be able to guarantee that the target of the demonstrators will not shift and that the rallies will not get out of control? Surely this consideration will make all foreign businesspeople fearful. Beijing should bring a halt to the anti-Japanese demonstrations and deal with the issue itself, rather than relying on popular pressure.
Tokyo should understand the perspective and feelings of those nations that suffered under Japanese occupation during the war, and reconsider its decision to revise its textbooks. Japan should follow Germany's example and face up to the injury it inflicted during the war, so that its people can learn from history and develop a peaceful spirit that abhors and seeks to avoid armed conflict.
The Chinese and Japanese foreign ministers have already missed one opportunity to resolve this problem. Coming up are the commemoration of the May 4 protests against the Versailles Conference, Victory over Japan (VJ) Day as well as a UN General Assembly meeting. Any of these occasions may give rise to additional tensions.
If this problem is not sorted out quickly and rationally it will become much more serious. China will face increased domestic pressure, as well as suspicion from the international community, while Japan will face damage to its huge investments in China. Both parties will suffer, and the international repercussions could be immense.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS