Breastfeeding, a practice that is encouraged internationally, is under scrutiny in Africa where little research has been undertaken on this method of nourishing infants in a time of AIDS.
Breast milk carries the AIDS virus. It is widely accepted that an estimated 15 percent of infants who are breastfed by infected mothers contract the virus.
Yet breastfeeding is still widely promoted as the safest option in Africa, where AIDS is rife and where the sanitary conditions needed for the preparation of artificial infant foods do not prevail.
But with a lack of conclusive scientific evidence, doctors, fieldworkers and AIDS lobby groups cannot agree on the best method of nutrition for the offspring of infected mothers.
International agencies like UNICEF appear not to have strayed too far from a long-standing "breast is best" campaign in developing nations, where it has taken decades to reverse the damage done by producers of infant milk formula.
The producers spent much of the 1970s presenting their products as a viable option for "sophisticated" mothers, officials from the agency explain.
Infant mortality rose as mothers the world over turned their backs on natural feeding. In resource-poor settings like Africa, infant formula is still the "very bad idea" it was then, according to the Pretoria-based UNICEF head of health Marinus Gotink.
But as the prevalence of AIDS pushes up mortality figures in countries like South Africa, some scientists are taking another look at artificial milk substitutes as a means of preventing infection in infants that are fortunate enough to escape the virus during the birth process.
Durban-based academic and researcher professor Anna Courtsoudis is adamant that, given the "balance of risk," breast milk is the safest.
Four years ago, she ran a trial that found exclusive breastfeeding for a limited time early in life reduced to about 4 percent the risk of HIV infection in infants.
Exclusive breastfeeding by lactating infected mothers ensures that infants are provided with the necessary antibodies to fight diseases, including AIDS, she said.
"In each case you have to weigh up the balance of risk. In wealthy western society you can formula-feed safely. But if you are from rural Kwazulu-Natal, the chances of your child dying because of this method is far higher," she said.
Cousoudis' position that highlights as dangerous mixed feeding, where breast milk and other foods are given over the same period, appears to dominate in some parts of the country and has informed UNICEF policy.
Some doctors working to prevent mother-to-child transmission of the AIDS virus in South Africa, where one in four pregnant women test positive for the disease, disagree, saying that formula feeding does not necessarily have to lead to pneumonia and diarrhoea that kill infants.
Medecins sans Frontieres' Herman Reuter is the project coordinator of an HIV prevention and treatment program in Lusikisiki, a rural district in the country's Eastern Cape province.
"We give the women the choice to breastfeed or formula-feed. We believe optimal formula feeding can be achieved even in rural areas like Lusikisiki," he said.
A similar program in the impoverished Western Cape township of Khayelitsha has also begun to dispel the view that the question of artificial feeding will cause more infant deaths.
AIDS activists argue that with enough support, formula feeding as the "only sure way to avoid post-birth mother-to-child HIV transmission," can become a reality for many more women regardless of their circumstances.
At many public health centers, formula is provided for infected women who decide against breastfeeding, but AIDS activists say healthcare workers are more likely to advocate breastfeeding in many areas around the country.
South Africa's mother-to-child AIDS prevention strategy is in its early stages, and the focus is still largely on preventing infection during labor and childbirth.
Some scientists and activists consider the introduction of the risk of infection through subsequent breastfeeding as a sure way of undermining the program.
Others go as far as to accuse agencies like UNICEF of "letting old hangups" with formula producers get in the way of logic.
"HIV-positive women should have a choice based on the best available information. However, what one finds is that in areas where doctors support exclusive breastfeeding, nearly all women choose this option, and vice-versa," said Nathan Geffen, a spokesman for the Treatment Action Campaign lobby group.
"We are aware that an important study will soon be published which will bring more clarity to this issue. We hope that once the results are public, scientists will reach consensus on which option is best," he said.
Mark Colvin, the researcher responsible for this study, says an ideal strategy would be that "breast is best" unless you are HIV positive.
"In the first world, of course nobody breastfeeds if they know they are infected," he points out.
More conclusive evidence of both methods of feeding is desperately needed in the developing world as "old studies" have been used to justify the sidelining and virtually exclude formula as an option, he believes.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS