During the early stages of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government's rule it seems there were many sympathizers of the CCP among British intelligentsia because of the perceived fascism and corruption of Chiang Kai-shek's (
People in the UK are not naturally sympathetic to the CCP, or to communism in general, and the events in the Soviet Union at the time of the Cold War reinforced this on our doorstep. However, due to the KMT's quasi-fascist nature, the CCP was seen as the lesser of two evils because of the bigger threat of Nazism than Soviet communism on the UK.
There were and are, many Western academics who tried to argue that Chinese communism was different. I believe that in the early years there were noble people who joined the CCP and this must not be forgotten, but the Cultural Revolution, Tiananmen Square massacre and today's lack of freedom of information, expression and speech in the People's Republic of China have irreversibly tarnished that view.
On the other hand, unfortunately, Taiwan's general image in the UK is still one of being a place where many toys and such goods are made (in the average British person's eyes). As Taiwan's democracy grows and develops, the Taiwanese representative office in the UK needs to do more to make known its democracy in the European psyche.
Additionally, is communism illegal in Taiwan? As part of the democratization process, communism needs to be accepted by Taiwanese as a legitimate voice in a pluralistic society. I'm sure that Taiwanese are mature enough to handle this and it would send a mature signal to Beijing that Taiwan has a superior moral argument over the CCP.
Roy Wilson
United Kingdom
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and