The unveiled faces of Saudi women will be open to public scrutiny from next year under a government order making it mandatory for women to carry their own, separate photographic identity card.
As of the middle of next year, it will be compulsory for every Saudi woman to have her own ID card, terminating the practice of the current family card, an identity pass that does not carry a photo of the woman and lists her as a dependent of her father or husband.
While it may seem a small move, the ID card is a big step in Saudi society where women are hidden behind veils, under-represented and deprived of most of the rights males enjoy in the country. Women's faces remain unseen in public, even in the media.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Conservatives in the Islamic kingdom have objected to the proposal since it was first raised by the Saudi government in 1999.
Islamic hard-liners object on the grounds that photographing the female face is un-Islamic, and likened to pimps men who would allow their female family members to have their photographs stuck on ID cards.
Such a comparison does not come as a surprise in a country were women are not allowed to drive, travel without written permission of a male guardian, or vote in the landmark municipal elections underway in the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia's traditional society is segregated and in public women wear long black robes called an abaya, plus a veil covering their heads and sometimes their faces.
Women are only encouraged to enter professions in fields where they are unlikely to have contact with men, such as education.
If they are business owners, they must appoint a male "agent" to take care of government transactions.
Hissah Al-Suwaileh, head of the Women's Civil Status Department in Riyadh, was quoted by the Arab News as saying that Saudi women required photographic ID cards to prove their identity and stamp out fraud.
The cards, to be issued by al-Suwaileh's department, would in future be the only card recognized by banks and government sectors.
"It is a necessity that must be acknowledged," said a Saudi female employee at one of the local banks who identified herself only as Noura.
"We've been asking clients to bring in their passports and those who don't have them, they've got to bring in a male guardian to verify their identities. After all, the family card only has her name on it which in any day and age could never be enough," Noura said.
"The process of identification has kept pace with modern technology in many parts of the world with voice detectors, retina and palm scanners being used. We however are still at point zero dealing with the photo issue: To show or not to show," she said.
Al-Suwaileh voiced concern that many Saudi women are misinformed about the requirements for applying for an ID card. They assume that the approval of their male guardians is a fundamental condition to obtain one.
This is not accurate, she says. A Saudi woman who has a valid passport can apply and obtain her ID card without the consent of a male guardian. Only when a woman does not hold her own passport does she need a male guardian to verify her identity.
But this new regulation has a drawback. Saudi women need the permission of a male guardian to obtain a passport in the first place.
"A Saudi woman can only obtain a passport with the consent of her male guardian, so what's a national ID card in comparison to the license to travel?" one applicant asked.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS