The unveiled faces of Saudi women will be open to public scrutiny from next year under a government order making it mandatory for women to carry their own, separate photographic identity card.
As of the middle of next year, it will be compulsory for every Saudi woman to have her own ID card, terminating the practice of the current family card, an identity pass that does not carry a photo of the woman and lists her as a dependent of her father or husband.
While it may seem a small move, the ID card is a big step in Saudi society where women are hidden behind veils, under-represented and deprived of most of the rights males enjoy in the country. Women's faces remain unseen in public, even in the media.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Conservatives in the Islamic kingdom have objected to the proposal since it was first raised by the Saudi government in 1999.
Islamic hard-liners object on the grounds that photographing the female face is un-Islamic, and likened to pimps men who would allow their female family members to have their photographs stuck on ID cards.
Such a comparison does not come as a surprise in a country were women are not allowed to drive, travel without written permission of a male guardian, or vote in the landmark municipal elections underway in the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia's traditional society is segregated and in public women wear long black robes called an abaya, plus a veil covering their heads and sometimes their faces.
Women are only encouraged to enter professions in fields where they are unlikely to have contact with men, such as education.
If they are business owners, they must appoint a male "agent" to take care of government transactions.
Hissah Al-Suwaileh, head of the Women's Civil Status Department in Riyadh, was quoted by the Arab News as saying that Saudi women required photographic ID cards to prove their identity and stamp out fraud.
The cards, to be issued by al-Suwaileh's department, would in future be the only card recognized by banks and government sectors.
"It is a necessity that must be acknowledged," said a Saudi female employee at one of the local banks who identified herself only as Noura.
"We've been asking clients to bring in their passports and those who don't have them, they've got to bring in a male guardian to verify their identities. After all, the family card only has her name on it which in any day and age could never be enough," Noura said.
"The process of identification has kept pace with modern technology in many parts of the world with voice detectors, retina and palm scanners being used. We however are still at point zero dealing with the photo issue: To show or not to show," she said.
Al-Suwaileh voiced concern that many Saudi women are misinformed about the requirements for applying for an ID card. They assume that the approval of their male guardians is a fundamental condition to obtain one.
This is not accurate, she says. A Saudi woman who has a valid passport can apply and obtain her ID card without the consent of a male guardian. Only when a woman does not hold her own passport does she need a male guardian to verify her identity.
But this new regulation has a drawback. Saudi women need the permission of a male guardian to obtain a passport in the first place.
"A Saudi woman can only obtain a passport with the consent of her male guardian, so what's a national ID card in comparison to the license to travel?" one applicant asked.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS