For many middle-aged workers, the July 1 deadline for the implementation of the reformed pension system heralds a huge change. Even the government's pledge that it would ensure retirees' financial security seems to be insufficient to allay their fears.
The new system does represent an advancement of labor rights, which guarantees us a chance to eat the carrot that has long been hanging in front of us. Although an "elderly economy" still belongs to the future, it has triggered controversy in the present. Some media reported that companies are targeting both white and blue-collar workers above 40 for forced retirement. The optimum career age is now around 35, and anyone over 35 is regarded as starting to lag in productivity.
This is certainly a tragic scene at the end of one's career. At entry level, there is an overflow of university students, while most enterprises only consider applicants who hold at least a master's degree and keep lowering the starting wages. Tuition fees continue to rise rather than fall, since the government considers higher eduction to be a voluntary investment. Investments should produce returns, but the outlook for returns on higher education seems less than promising.
The amount of time spent on studies has increased along with the price of education, but incomes have fallen and the golden career window has shrunk. Facing up to an aging society with an extended life expectancy and a severe imbalance in manpower investment is the real story of Taiwan. Despite being granted a future carrot, it is still a promise of future relief. Who will help us live through the current confusion?
Hence we are rewriting human capital theory, based on factors such as the new retirement pension system, the industrial system and personal career planning, as well as the overall social environment. Today, although higher education no longer guarantees a great career in Taiwan, we can hardly give up our thirst for higher qualifications. As our straightforward career path has become twisted and hopeless, we can see that our educational system and reforms are in fact unable to deal with the massive changes in the workplace.
When the economy was more vibrant, nobody had to work too hard. Take Japan for example: During the economic bubble of the 1980s, many young Japanese chose part-time rather than full-time jobs, hoping to free their minds, and giving rise to the name "freeter." But according to a survey conducted by the Japanese government last year, about 70 percent of the so-called freeters aged between 15 and 34 actually hope to be able to work full-time again. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to restore the economic prosperity of the past.
In Japan's labor market today, one-third of the laborers work part-time or under temporary contracts. Japanese academics ascribe this to the gradually eroding social security system, combined with the youth's unwillingness to have children, which has compounded Japan's problems with an aging population.
On the eve of the implementation of the new pension system, Taiwan is obviously repeating Japan's mistake, as part-time, temporarily leased and contracted jobs will become the norm as enterprises cut back on labor costs. If we look closer, we can see the chain reaction such drastic career changes will set in motion, such as creating work instability. But no one is willing to take the necessary actions to remedy such social changes from an overall perspective.
Perhaps this problem will become more apparent in the next 10 or 20 years. Nevertheless, by following in Japan's footsteps, we may repeatedly miss the chance to remedy the situation.
Jeremy Lu is the chief editor of Mine Magazine.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI AND EDDY CHANG
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS