The vacation paradise of the Maldives, with its famous beautiful white sand beaches, crystal-clear water and spectacular sunshine, shows no obvious signs of impending disaster.
But perhaps no other country in the world will be hit harder by climate change over the next decade. Experts say the very existence of the Maldives -- a chain of islands with about 300,000 inhabitants -- is threatened as it literally sinks over time.
The country's government has appealed urgently to the international community to provide better environmental protection.
Officials say targets set by the Kyoto Protocol which took effect on Feb. 16 don't nearly go far enough. So far, though, the government pleas seem to have gone unheard.
The Dec. 26 tsunami showed residents of the Maldives how vulnerable the country really is: 69 of the 199 inhabited islands were completely flooded. Unlike other tsunami-hit nations, residents of the Maldives could not flee the flood waters to nearby stable land masses. Many were forced to cling to palm trees or save themselves by swimming to safety.
While climate change is much more gradual than a raging tsunami, experts believe the eventual destruction could bring even more dreadful results than the tidal waves.
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates the sea level could rise up to 88cm by 2100.
"Then almost all islands would be gone," Maldives Deputy Environment Minister Abdullahi Majeed said. "Even half that amount would have a dramatic impact on us."
About 80 percent of the Maldives sits lower than 1m above the sea level, with the highest elevation reaching just 2.4m.
"We have no chance to protect the people," Majeed said, and predicts dangerous results for residents of the Maldives.
"Some will try to save themselves by going from small islands to larger ones," he said. "Others will become environmental refugees."
These people will be seeking asylum in foreign nations as their own homeland sinks, he said.
Already, residents on about half of the inhabited islands in the Maldives are trying to prevent further beach erosion.
"Climate change and projected sea-level rise would aggravate the present problem of beach erosion," the country's First National Communication to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change warns.
Increasing temperatures are also threatening the coral reefs, which not only protect the islands, but are also a major draw for tourists visiting the Maldives. The coral is very sensitive to temperature changes.
For years, the Maldives has seen a gradual rise in temperature. The government in Male cannot afford to wait around for an end to the debate over whether or not climate change actually exists.
"Many people say there is still no conclusive proof that the sea level is truly rising," Majeed said. "But we don't have time -- 20, 30 or 50 years -- to wait for such proof."
Many Maldives residents might well see injustice in the fact that they don't even contribute much to the greenhouse effect creating climate change. Government statistics show the country is responsible for just 0.0012 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions.
On the other hand, the eight major industrial countries, the G8, produced 48.7 percent of greenhouse gases in the year 1999. The Kyoto treaty requires signatories to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to at least five percent below 1990 levels by the year 2012.
The Maldives was the first country to sign the protocol accord and had, along with other small nations, favored much higher targets. Of course they were not able to overcome the powerful delegations from industrialized nations to have stricter goals implemented.
"Kyoto is good, but far too little," the deputy minister said. "What is 5 percent? Nobody will even notice this."
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS