Lai I-Chong (賴怡忠) of the Taiwan Thinktank was in Chicago recently. He gave a speech regarding the "anti-separation law" after a 228 memorial concert. (The official Chinese translation is "anti-secession" law, which is a falsified translation for Chinese propaganda purposes.) One of his suggestions to counter the law was to enact a Taiwanese domestic law to declare Taiwan's sovereignty.
I agree with his point. My suggestion to him was to pass by means of a referendum a Taiwanese domestic law to declare Taiwan's sovereignty, and declare the People's Republic of China an enemy state. Anyone in Taiwan who assists China in violating Taiwan's sovereignty should be punished for high treason.
Declaring Taiwan's sovereignty is merely a statement of reality; it does not change the status quo. It is the "anti-separation" law that is attempting to change the status quo.
Such a law will not likely be passed in the current legislature, but if clearly phrased and understood by the voters, it could very likely pass the threshold for a referendum.
That China is an enemy state of Taiwan is more than evident. Such a statement, if passed, would put to rest once and for all the confusion in China and the rest of world, by clearly stating that Taiwanese do not want "unification" with the communist People's Republic of China.
Such a law should have teeth. There is no democratic country in the world in which citizens are free to betray their country's sovereignty.
The inexperience of the Democratic Progressive Party administration, which is eager to protect free speech and human rights, has led many traitors and Chinese agents to abuse their freedoms without fear of punishment. They are sowing confusion for the international community, and attempting to murder Taiwanese liberties.
The boundaries of free speech should be clarified: There is no freedom to betray one's country, nor freedom to infringe on others' freedom.
Unity in Taiwan will come when its purpose and the ways to achieve it are clear. In order to preserve their freedom, Taiwanese have to be involved, unite and know how to achieve their goals. To know how to counter China's aggression in every aspect of legal, diplomatic, psychological, military and propaganda warfare is the only way to preserve their freedom.
After all, Taiwan has the best weapons, which China cannot purchase: free speech and democracy. To prevent these rights from being abused takes wisdom and guts.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS