When the Iron Curtain fell 15 years ago, the free world's scientists got their first good look at the environmental consequences of East Europe's communist economy.
Scientists worldwide have since been studying the region's polluted sites and helping post-communist governments launch massive cleanups of old Soviet military bases, Czech uranium mines and Slovakian chemical plants.
Now, the same scientists are turning their attention to a new and apparently larger environmental challenge -- China.
A window to China's problems with land and water contamination is slowly opening to the rest of the world's environmental experts. As a result European scientists, including some from former communist countries, are getting involved.
Czech plant biotechnology specialist Tomas Vanek, who was recently invited by Beijing authorities to work on soil contamination issues, says: "Now China is starting to cooperate."
An international conference in Nanjing last autumn reflected what appears to be China's growing willingness to accept foreign expertise.
British, Dutch and Czech scientists were among those welcomed to the Soil Pollution and Remediation Conference, sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and other government agencies.
They focused on ways to remedy environmental problems created by China's ongoing rush to industrialize, modernize farms and expand cities.
Vanek presented a paper on the use of flax and hemp crops to remediate land contaminated by low-level radioactivity.
According to his five-year study, flax can be safely grown in radioactive soil and then harvested for industrial purposes, such as fibres and non-edible oils. Both crops also prevent erosion and provide revenue to offset the costs of managing waste sites.
Similar studies on so-called "phytoremediation" techniques are being conducted around the world.
Swedish scientists are now testing Vanek's idea to grow hemp on polluted land and process the harvested crop for auto insulation, rope or as an energy source.
Vanek said Chinese officials "are very interested" in phytoremediation as a low-cost solution to land pollution.
How much land in the world's largest country will require an environmental cleanup?
"No one really knows," Vanek says. "This data is partially confidential."
Papers presented by Chinese scientists at the conference confirmed Vanek's point. One by four experts from the science academy and a Nanjing university said the amount of soil pollution nationwide is "unclear."
The Chinese experts cited a 1999 Beijing government report which said "various contaminants" had polluted 20 percent of the nation's cropland, while "another report indicated that about 20 million hectares of the cropland was contaminated with heavy metals and about 60 million hectares of cropland was polluted with pesticides and other chemicals."
Other Chinese scientists at the gathering emphasized a need for more basic research, environmental standards and government regulations to clean up polluted land as well as prevent contamination.
A key impetus for giving the environment more attention, the scientists said, was foreign investment.
Multinational companies that have expanded, or may expand, into China often carry their own land use standards which, for example, prevent them from building factories on heavily polluted ground.
One study at the conference described the complicated process of testing and then remediating polluted groundwater at a site in northern China where a company wanted to build an auto factory. The water had been contaminated by chemicals leaking from a former lumber yard.
European scientists like Vanek are offering their Chinese colleagues research findings as well as important information based on personal experience.
One study presented by Swiss and Bulgarian scientists, for example, examined problems near Sofia where farmland was contaminated by metals from industrial smelters. Similarly a British study looked at using plants to clean up sites tainted by explosives.
Vanek says recent Czech experience with cleaning up old uranium mines, which supplied material for Soviet warheads and nuclear plants, helped underscore the advantages of flax as a money-making cover crop in radioactive areas.
Now Vanek is working through e-mails with Chinese scientists who face similar issues and, finally, are allowed to talk about it openly with experts around the world.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS